ArticleInnovative surgical sciences2024
Spontaneous duodenocutaneous fistula: a rare presentation of perforated duodenal ulcer.
Article in Innovative surgical sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Fistula formation between the duodenum and the skin of the anterior abdominal wall is a rare complication and reported most often following surgery. To the best of our knowledge, the development of a spontaneous duodenocutaneous fistula in association with duodenal ulcer has only been reported once. Case presentation: A 52-year-old female patient presented at the emergency department with a painful ulcer and erythema on the right abdominal wall. On admission, she was in extremely poor general and nutritional condition. Laboratory analysis revealed inflammation. An empiric antibiotic therapy was initiated; parenteral nutrition, fluid, and electrolyte resuscitation were started. An enterocutaneous fistula was postulated and confirmed by endoscopy identifying a perforated duodenal ulcer. Surgery was not a valuable option and a Foley catheter was inserted through the fistula. During further endoscopic interventions, the Foley catheter was first replaced by a jejunal tube and later by a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy with a jejunal limb for enteral nutrition. The fistula output decreased, the local infection was controlled and the nutritional status improved. Conclusions: Three months later the fistula was closed and the gastrostomy tube was removed. After 2 years the patient was in good general and nutritional condition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.