ArticleAACE clinical case reports
Rituximab Therapy for Insulin Allergy in Type-1 Diabetes Mellitus.
Article in AACE clinical case reports. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Orphan GPCRs in diabetes mellitus: metabolic control, inflammation, and drug development.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Review
- Editorial for July/August Issue of AACE Clinical Case Reports.AACE clinical case reportsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/Objective: Allergic reactions to insulin have decreased significantly since the introduction of human insulin preparation, but up to 2.4% of insulin-treated patients can still be affected. Rituximab is a monoclonal antibody against the surface antigen CD20 on B lymphocytes, and it is largely used to treat lymphoproliferative and rheumatological conditions. In a very few published case reports, rituximab has been used as an investigational drug to treat severe insulin allergy refractory to conventional therapy. Here, we present an unusual case of a 40-year-old woman with T1DM and severe insulin allergy that was successfully treated with rituximab. Case Report: The patient was diagnosed with T1DM at age 37. Three years later, skin reactions developed at insulin administration sites. These consisted of pruritic and painful erythema and wheals that appeared within 1 to 4 h of insulin administration, followed by induration, subcutaneous nodules, and surrounding lipodystrophy that lasted several days with spontaneous resolution in 1 to 2 weeks. Extensive immunologic evaluation suggested the reaction was related to insulin allergy. Skin biopsy revealed sublobular panniculitis. After failed conventional treatment with antihistamines, glucocorticoid, and various insulins, rituximab infusion as an investigational approach was initiated. This was very successful, leading to prolonged remission of her insulin allergy. Discussion: First-line management of insulin allergy should focus on second-generation antihistamines and switching insulin preparation. In refractory cases, systemic immunotherapy with rituximab can be a viable option. Conclusion: Practitioners should be aware that in patients with insulin allergy who fail conventional treatment, immunotherapy with rituximab can be a viable option.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.