ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2024
Embedded-deep-learning-based sample-to-answer device for on-site malaria diagnosis.
Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluating the Adversarial Robustness and Clinical Safety of Quantized Hierarchical Transformers for Edge-Based Malaria Microscopy.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Automated microscopy for malaria diagnosis in a reference laboratory in nonendemic settings.Parasites & vectors · 2026Article
- AI-Supported Digital Microscopy Diagnostics in Primary Health Care Laboratories: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Diagnostic Accuracy of the National Library of Medicine (NLM) Screener Application in Screening for Malaria Parasites Among Blood Donors at the Korle-Bu Blood Bank, Ghana: A Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of tropical medicine · 2026Article
- Algal metabolites as emerging anti-virulence therapeutics against Pseudomonas aeruginosa.Archives of microbiology · 2025Review
- Enhanced detection of malaria infected red blood cells through phase driven classification.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Diagnosis ofJournal of clinical microbiology · 2025Article
- A large multi-focus dataset for white blood cell classification.Scientific data · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Improvements in digital microscopy are critical for the development of a malaria diagnosis method that is accurate at the cellular level and exhibits satisfactory clinical performance. Digital microscopy can be enhanced by improving deep learning algorithms and achieving consistent staining results. In this study, a novel miLab™ device incorporating the solid hydrogel staining method was proposed for consistent blood film preparation, eliminating the use of complex equipment and liquid reagent maintenance. The miLab™ ensures consistent, high-quality, and reproducible blood films across various hematocrits by leveraging deformable staining patches. Embedded-deep-learning-enabled miLab™ was utilized to detect and classify malarial parasites from autofocused images of stained blood cells using an internal optical system. The results of this method were consistent with manual microscopy images. This method not only minimizes human error but also facilitates remote assistance and review by experts through digital image transmission. This method can set a new paradigm for on-site malaria diagnosis. The miLab™ algorithm for malaria detection achieved a total accuracy of 98.86% for infected red blood cell (RBC) classification. Clinical validation performed in Malawi demonstrated an overall percent agreement of 92.21%. Based on these results, miLab™ can become a reliable and efficient tool for decentralized malaria diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.