Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39100605›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India

Change of the suprapubic catheter: Not always safe!

Ajay S Kanbur, Shrivastava Pushkar, Pankaj N Maheshwari

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ajay S KanburDepartment of Urology, Jupiter Hospital, Thane, Maharashtra, India.
Shrivastava PushkarDepartment of Urology, Fortis Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Pankaj N MaheshwariDepartment of Urology, Fortis Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Suprapubic catheterization (SPC) is a commonly used technique for urinary bladder drainage. As an SPC may be needed for long term, the catheter needs to be changed every 2-6 weeks. Change of SPC is a simple and a safe outpatient procedure. Presented here are three unusual complications that occurred when changing the SPC catheter such as catheter getting misplaced up the ureter, balloon extruding outside the urethra and one case of bowel perforation. It is possible that greater awareness of risks and use of a proper technique could have prevented all three complications.

Identifiers

PMID39100605
PMCPMC11296586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.