Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39100604›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India

The impact of sestamibi scan on clinical decision-making for renal masses: An observational single-center study.

Courtney Yong, Yan Tong, Mark Tann, Chandru P Sundaram

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. What's inside.Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India
    Article
  2. Sestamibi scans for renal oncocytomas: Promising potential, but limitations remain.Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Courtney YongDepartment of Urology, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Yan TongDepartment of Biostatistics and Health Data Science, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Mark TannDepartment of Radiology, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Chandru P SundaramDepartment of Urology, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: We aimed to determine whether sestamibi scan changes management of renal masses. Methods: All patients undergoing sestamibi scan for renal masses between 2008 and 2022 at a single center were retrospectively reviewed. Data were gathered on patient demographics, pre- and postoperative creatinine, sestamibi scan parameters, and cross-sectional imaging characteristics. Outcomes included whether the patient underwent renal mass biopsy or surgical resection and the final pathological diagnosis if tissue was obtained from biopsy or resection. Data regarding postbiopsy as well as postoperative complications were also collected. The odds ratio (OR) for surgery or biopsy based on sestamibi result was calculated. Results: Forty-three patients underwent sestamibi scan from 2008 to 2022, with 10 scans consistent with oncocytoma and 33 with nononcocytoma. The mean tumor size at initial presentation was 4.0 ± 1.8 cm with a median RENAL score of 7 (range: 4-11). For patients with sestamibi scans negative for oncocytoma, the OR for surgery was 12.5 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.1-71.2, Conclusions: A sestamibi scan positive for oncocytoma led to increased use of renal mass biopsy for confirmation. Sestamibi scans that were negative for oncocytoma were more likely to result in surgical resection without biopsy.

Identifiers

PMID39100604
PMCPMC11296591

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.