Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39100598›Full record

ArticleBio-protocol2024

Approach for Electrophysiological Studies of Spinal Lamina X Neurons.

Volodymyr Krotov, Pavel Belan, Nana Voitenko

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bio-protocol, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Volodymyr KrotovDepartment of Molecular Biophysics, Bogomoletz Institute of Physiology, Kyiv, Ukraine.
Pavel BelanDepartment of Molecular Biophysics, Bogomoletz Institute of Physiology, Kyiv, Ukraine.
Nana VoitenkoDepartment of Biomedicine and Neuroscience, Kyiv Academic University, Kyiv, Ukraine.

Funding

The Role of the Complement System in Spinal Mechanisms of Chronic PainR01NS113189 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI USACHEV, YURIY M · 2019 to 2023
$2.2M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS113189
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite playing diverse physiological roles, the area surrounding the central canal, lamina X, remains one of the least studied spinal cord regions. Technical challenges and limitations of the commonly used experimental approaches are the main difficulties that hamper lamina X research. In the current protocol, we describe a reliable method for functional investigation of lamina X neurons that requires neither time-consuming slicing nor sophisticated in vivo experiments. Our approach relies on ex vivo hemisected spinal cord preparation that preserves the rostrocaudal and mediolateral spinal architecture as well as the dorsal roots, and infrared LED oblique illumination for visually guided patch clamp in thick blocks of tissue. When coupled with electric stimulation of the spared dorsal roots, electrophysiological recordings provide information on primary afferent inputs to lamina X neurons from myelinated and non-myelinated fibers and allow estimating primary afferent-driven presynaptic inhibition. Overall, we describe a simple, time-efficient, inexpensive, and versatile approach for lamina X research. Key features • Quick and easy preparation procedure that grants access to lamina X neurons without spinal cord slicing • Preserved rostrocaudal and mediolateral connectivity and preserved primary afferent supply • Ability to perform electrophysiological recordings in combination with dorsal root stimulations allowing to study afferent inputs and presynaptic inhibition of lamina X neurons.

Indexed as

Dorsal root stimulationElectrophysiologyLamina XPostsynaptic currentsPresynaptic inhibitionSpinal cord

Identifiers

PMID39100598
PMCPMC11292132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.