ArticleAmerican journal of ophthalmology case reports2024
A
Article in American journal of ophthalmology case reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: Cone-rod dystrophies (CORD) are inherited retinal dystrophies characterized by primary cone degeneration with secondary rod involvement. We report two patients from the same family with a dominant variant in the guanylate cyclase 2D ( Observations: A 21-year-old lady (Patient 1) was referred due to experiencing blurry vision and color vision impairment. Visual field testing revealed a central scotoma. Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) and fundus autofluorescence (FAF) documented macula dysfunction. Reduced amplitude was observed in the photopic responses of ERG. Her 54-year-old father (Patient 2) had similar issues with blurry vision. A dilated fundus examination displayed bilateral macular atrophy. Loss of the ellipsoid zone line and collapse of the outer nuclear segment were noted on the SD-OCT. Photopic ERG responses were extinguished, and an electronegative ERG was observed in the dark-adapted 3.0 ERG. The gene report revealed a c.2512C > T (p.Arg838Cys) variant in Conclusions: We report two different clinical phenotypes in
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.