Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39100501›Full record

ArticleHealthcare technology letters2024

Machine learning modelling for predicting the utilization of invasive and non-invasive ventilation throughout the ICU duration.

Emma Schwager, Mohsen Nabian, Xinggang Liu, Ting Feng, Robin French, Pam Amelung, Louis Atallah, Omar Badawi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare technology letters, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Emma SchwagerPhilips Research North America Cambridge Massachusetts USA.
Mohsen NabianPhilips Clinical AI and Analytics New Brunswick New Jersey USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7867-5610
Xinggang LiuJohnson and Johnson Limited New Brunswick New Jersey USA.
Ting FengPhilips Research North America Cambridge Massachusetts USA.
Robin FrenchPhilips EMR & Care Management Cambridge Massachusetts USA.
Pam AmelungPhilips EMR & Care Management Cambridge Massachusetts USA.
Louis AtallahPhilips EMR & Care Management Cambridge Massachusetts USA.
Omar BadawiTrial Library San Francisco California USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The goal of this work is to develop a Machine Learning model to predict the need for both invasive and non-invasive mechanical ventilation in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Using the Philips eICU Research Institute (ERI) database, 2.6 million ICU patient data from 2010 to 2019 were analyzed. This data was randomly split into training (63%), validation (27%), and test (10%) sets. Additionally, an external test set from a single hospital from the ERI database was employed to assess the model's generalizability. Model performance was determined by comparing the model probability predictions with the actual incidence of ventilation use, either invasive or non-invasive. The model demonstrated a prediction performance with an AUC of 0.921 for overall ventilation, 0.937 for invasive, and 0.827 for non-invasive. Factors such as high Glasgow Coma Scores, younger age, lower BMI, and lower PaCO2 were highlighted as indicators of a lower likelihood for the need for ventilation. The model can serve as a retrospective benchmarking tool for hospitals to assess ICU performance concerning mechanical ventilation necessity. It also enables analysis of ventilation strategy trends and risk-adjusted comparisons, with potential for future testing as a clinical decision tool for optimizing ICU ventilation management.

Indexed as

medical computingmedical information systemsmedical signal processingpatient carepatient monitoringpattern classification

Identifiers

PMID39100501
PMCPMC11294931

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.