Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39100452›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

COVIDHealth: A novel labeled dataset and machine learning-based web application for classifying COVID-19 discourses on Twitter.

Mahathir Mohammad Bishal, Md Rakibul Hassan Chowdory, Anik Das, Muhammad Ashad Kabir

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mahathir Mohammad BishalDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Chittagong University of Engineering and Technology, Chattogram, 4349, Bangladesh.
Md Rakibul Hassan ChowdoryDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Chittagong University of Engineering and Technology, Chattogram, 4349, Bangladesh.
Anik DasDepartment of Computer Science, St. Francis Xavier University, Antigonish, B2G 2W5, NS, Canada.
Muhammad Ashad KabirSchool of Computing, Mathematics, and Engineering, Charles Sturt University, Bathurst, 2795, NSW, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has sparked widespread health-related discussions on social media platforms like Twitter (now named 'X'). However, the lack of labeled Twitter data poses significant challenges for theme-based classification and tweet aggregation. To address this gap, we developed a machine learning-based web application that automatically classifies COVID-19 discourses into five categories: health risks, prevention, symptoms, transmission, and treatment. We collected and labeled 6,667 COVID-19-related tweets using the Twitter API, and applied various feature extraction methods to extract relevant features. We then compared the performance of seven classical machine learning algorithms (Decision Tree, Random Forest, Stochastic Gradient Descent, Adaboost, K-Nearest Neighbor, Logistic Regression, and Linear SVC) and four deep learning techniques (LSTM, CNN, RNN, and BERT) for classification. Our results show that the CNN achieved the highest precision (90.41%), recall (90.4%), F1 score (90.4%), and accuracy (90.4%). The Linear SVC algorithm exhibited the highest precision (85.71%), recall (86.94%), and F1 score (86.13%) among classical machine learning approaches. Our study advances the field of health-related data analysis and classification, and offers a publicly accessible web-based tool for public health researchers and practitioners. This tool has the potential to support addressing public health challenges and enhancing awareness during pandemics. The dataset and application are accessible at https://github.com/Bishal16/COVID19-Health-Related-Data-Classification-Website.

Indexed as

ClassificationCOVID-19 discussionsDeep learningMachine learningTwitter datasetWeb application

Identifiers

PMID39100452
PMCPMC11295851

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.