ArticleHeliyon2024
COVIDHealth: A novel labeled dataset and machine learning-based web application for classifying COVID-19 discourses on Twitter.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has sparked widespread health-related discussions on social media platforms like Twitter (now named 'X'). However, the lack of labeled Twitter data poses significant challenges for theme-based classification and tweet aggregation. To address this gap, we developed a machine learning-based web application that automatically classifies COVID-19 discourses into five categories: health risks, prevention, symptoms, transmission, and treatment. We collected and labeled 6,667 COVID-19-related tweets using the Twitter API, and applied various feature extraction methods to extract relevant features. We then compared the performance of seven classical machine learning algorithms (Decision Tree, Random Forest, Stochastic Gradient Descent, Adaboost, K-Nearest Neighbor, Logistic Regression, and Linear SVC) and four deep learning techniques (LSTM, CNN, RNN, and BERT) for classification. Our results show that the CNN achieved the highest precision (90.41%), recall (90.4%), F1 score (90.4%), and accuracy (90.4%). The Linear SVC algorithm exhibited the highest precision (85.71%), recall (86.94%), and F1 score (86.13%) among classical machine learning approaches. Our study advances the field of health-related data analysis and classification, and offers a publicly accessible web-based tool for public health researchers and practitioners. This tool has the potential to support addressing public health challenges and enhancing awareness during pandemics. The dataset and application are accessible at https://github.com/Bishal16/COVID19-Health-Related-Data-Classification-Website.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.