Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39100431›Full record

ArticlePatient preference and adherence2024

Preference for a Novel Oral Alternative to Parenterally Administered Medications.

Joshua T Myers, Jacques Van Dam, Mir Imran, Mir Hashim, Arvinder K Dhalla

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Patient preference and adherence, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Oral Incretin-Based Therapies for Weight Management.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2026
    Review
  4. Oral vitamin B₁₂ after total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: mapping the evidence.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Joshua T MyersRani Therapeutics, San Jose, CA, USA.ORCID 0009-0002-1467-6282
Jacques Van DamRani Therapeutics, San Jose, CA, USA.
Mir ImranRani Therapeutics, San Jose, CA, USA.ORCID 0009-0009-8150-3825
Mir HashimRani Therapeutics, San Jose, CA, USA.
Arvinder K DhallaRani Therapeutics, San Jose, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Rani Therapeutics is developing a robotic pill (RP), an oral drug delivery platform called RaniPill Methods: A total of 1689 adults taking injections (mean duration 3-7 years) to treat endocrine or inflammatory conditions were anonymously surveyed online for their preference to administer/prescribe medications orally via the RP. In the clinical study, 150 participants currently taking injections for chronic conditions evaluated the swallowability of a Mock-RP and completed a questionnaire regarding their preferences. Results: Majority of respondents surveyed stated they would be willing to convert to an oral alternative over their current parenteral therapy regardless of drug or disease. In the clinical study, all participants were able to swallow the Mock-RP and 91% indicated their preference for the oral route versus their current parenteral route of drug administration. Survey respondents and those in the clinical study using frequent injections were more willing to select a once-daily capsule compared to those injecting infrequently. Even study participants who inject infrequently (≥monthly: 80%) would prefer a once-daily pill over their injection regimen. Conclusion: Patients taking injections and prescribing physicians strongly prefer oral dosing to parenteral administration of biologics even if dosing frequency with the oral option, such as the RP, is increased.

Indexed as

biotherapeuticonce-daily pilloral drug deliveryrobotic pillswallowability

Identifiers

PMID39100431
PMCPMC11298207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.