ArticleResuscitation plus2024
Development of an algorithm to guide management of cardiorespiratory arrest in a diving bell.
Article in Resuscitation plus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Occupational health challenges in commercial diving: a qualitative study of psychological risk, training gaps, and organisational responsibilities.Diving and hyperbaric medicine · 2026Article
- Advances in the delivery of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in a diving bell.Diving and hyperbaric medicine · 2025Review
- Upright CPR: A novel approach to delivering chest compressions to a seated casualty in a diving bell.Resuscitation plus · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: The management of cardiorespiratory arrest in a diving bell presents multiple clinical, technical, and environmental considerations that standard resuscitation algorithms do not address, and no situation-specific algorithm exists. The development and testing of an algorithm to guide the management of cardiorespiratory arrest in a bell is described. Methods: An iterative approach to algorithm development was used. Phase 1 involved a small multidisciplinary group and took place in a simulation centre and a decommissioned diving bell. The algorithm was then refined in a purpose-build simulation complex with repeated simulation by a group of divers, and with input from industry experts. ALS principles were followed unless contextual or technical factors necessitated deviation. Results: Clinical and technical aspects of the resuscitation are addressed. Key priorities that conflict with standard ALS principles are: prioritisation of rescue breaths; use of mechanical CPR when available; and the provision of CPR with the casualty in a seated position where necessary. Conclusion: This is the first algorithm to guide the delivery of resuscitation in a diving bell. It incorporates adapted ALS principles and available data concerning compression technique effectiveness, and was informed by industry and clinical expertise. It provides guiding principles that can be adapted to setting-specific needs, and we would encourage its industry-wide international adoption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.