ArticleACS omega2024
Biosolid Gasification Performance Prediction Using a Stoichiometric Thermodynamic Model.
Article in ACS omega, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The gasification process can recover energy from biosolids produced in wastewater treatment. This paper developed a stoichiometric thermodynamic equilibrium model for biosolid gasification based on the biosolid properties, thermodynamic database, and equilibrium constants. If the calculation result showed that the quantity of char was negative, the quantity of char was put to zero, and the simulation was carried out again. The model was first verified by woody gasification under isothermal conditions, and the influence of a given temperature on biosolid gasification was simulated. The model further investigated the effects of different feedstock types, moisture contents, equivalence ratios, and reaction extensions on the adiabatic temperature, exergy efficiency, and syngas properties under autothermal conditions. The four factors were all the main factors for adiabatic temperature. The exergy efficiency depended more on the operation conditions than on the feedstock type. The H
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.