ArticleACS omega2024
A Hybrid Control Framework for Chemical Processes with Long Time Delay: Theory and Experiments.
Article in ACS omega, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper proposes a hybrid control framework based on internal model concepts, sliding mode control methodology, and fractional-order calculus theory. As a result, a modified Smith predictor (SP) is proposed for nonlinear systems with significant delays. The particular predictive approach enhances the sliding mode control (SMC) controller's transient responses for dead-time processes, and the SMC gives the predictive structure robustness for model mismatches by combining the previous methods with fractional order concepts; the result is a dynamical sliding mode controller. A numerical example is considered to evaluate the performance of the proposed approach, where a step change, external disturbance, and parametric uncertainty test are performed. A real application in the TCLab Arduino kit is presented; the proposed method presented good performance with a little amount of chattering, and in the disturbance rejection case, the overshoot increased with an aggressive response; in both cases, better tuning parameters can improve the process response and the controller action.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.