Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39100166›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2024

How frequently are insects wounded in the wild? A case study using

Bengisu S Subasi, Veit Grabe, Martin Kaltenpoth, Jens Rolff, Sophie A O Armitage

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. A genetic model of copulatory wounding inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Evolution letters · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Insect immunity in the Anthropocene.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Naturally occurring viruses ofProceedings. Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  12. Feeding ecology and behavioral adaptations shape injury patterns in central European ants.Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Bengisu S SubasiInstitute of Biology, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-4422-8377
Veit GrabeMicroscopic Imaging Service Group, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Jena, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0736-2771
Martin KaltenpothDepartment of Insect Symbiosis, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Jena, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9450-0345
Jens RolffInstitute of Biology, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1529-5409
Sophie A O ArmitageInstitute of Biology, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5561-9543

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wounding occurs across multicellular organisms. Wounds can affect host mobility and reproduction, with ecological consequences for competitive interactions and predator-prey dynamics. Wounds are also entry points for pathogens. An immune response is activated upon injury, resulting in the deposition of the brown-black pigment melanin in insects. Despite the abundance of immunity studies in the laboratory and the potential ecological and evolutionary implications of wounding, the prevalence of wounding in wild-collected insects is rarely systematically explored. We investigated the prevalence and potential causes of wounds in wild-collected Drosophilidae flies. We found that 31% of

Indexed as

cuticle damagecuticle injurycuticle woundmelaninmitewild-collected organism

Identifiers

PMID39100166
PMCPMC11296199

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.