Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39100157›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2024

Identifying prey capture events of a free-ranging marine predator using bio-logger data and deep learning.

Stefan Schoombie, Lorène Jeantet, Marianna Chimienti, Grace J Sutton, Pierre A Pistorius, Emmanuel Dufourq, Andrew D Lowther, W Chris Oosthuizen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Stefan SchoombieDepartment of Statistical Sciences, Centre for Statistics in Ecology, Environment and Conservation (SEEC), University of Cape Town, Cape Town 7701, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6566-0443
Lorène JeantetAfrican Institute for Mathematical Sciences, Cape Town 7945, South Africa.
Marianna ChimientiCentre D'Études Biologiques de Chizé, UMR7372 CNRS-La Rochelle, Villiers-en-Bois, France.
Grace J SuttonDepartment of Environment & Genetics, and Research Centre for Future Landscapes, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC 3086, Australia.
Pierre A PistoriusMarine Apex Predator Research Unit, Department of Zoology and Institute for Coastal and Marine Research, Nelson Mandela University, Gqeberha 6031, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6561-7069
Emmanuel DufourqAfrican Institute for Mathematical Sciences, Cape Town 7945, South Africa.
Andrew D LowtherNorwegian Polar Institute, Tromsø, Norway.
W Chris OosthuizenDepartment of Statistical Sciences, Centre for Statistics in Ecology, Environment and Conservation (SEEC), University of Cape Town, Cape Town 7701, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2905-6297

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Marine predators are integral to the functioning of marine ecosystems, and their consumption requirements should be integrated into ecosystem-based management policies. However, estimating prey consumption in diving marine predators requires innovative methods as predator-prey interactions are rarely observable. We developed a novel method, validated by animal-borne video, that uses tri-axial acceleration and depth data to quantify prey capture rates in chinstrap penguins (

Indexed as

accelerometeranimal behaviour classificationanimal-borne videochinstrap penguinforaging ecologymachine learning

Identifiers

PMID39100157
PMCPMC11296051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.