Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39100152›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2024

Cardenolides in the defensive fluid of adult large milkweed bugs have differential potency on vertebrate and invertebrate predator Na

P Rubiano-Buitrago, S Pradhan, A A Aceves, S Mohammadi, C Paetz, H M Rowland

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Divergent dietary and defensive adaptations of closely related coexisting seed bugs.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

P Rubiano-BuitragoResearch Group Predators and Toxic Prey, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Jena, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4750-8528
S PradhanResearch Group Predators and Toxic Prey, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Jena, Germany.
A A AcevesResearch Group Predators and Toxic Prey, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Jena, Germany.
S MohammadiResearch Group Predators and Toxic Prey, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Jena, Germany.
C PaetzResearch Group Biosynthesis/NMR, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Jena, Germany.
H M RowlandResearch Group Predators and Toxic Prey, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Jena, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1040-555X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aposematic animals rely on diverse secondary metabolites for defence. Various hypotheses, such as competition, life history and multifunctionality, have been posited to explain defence variability and diversity. We investigate the compound selectivity hypothesis using large milkweed bugs,

Indexed as

black-headed grosbeakcardiac glycosideOncopeltus fasciatuspredator–preytoxin–receptor interaction

Identifiers

PMID39100152
PMCPMC11296140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.