ArticleCureus2024
Finite Element Analysis and Clinical Applications of Transverse Post for the Rehabilitation of Endodontically Treated Teeth.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Effectiveness of horizontal posts to support MOD cavities compared with other restorative approaches in endodontically treated teeth: systematic review with meta-analysis of laboratory studies.BMC oral health · 2025Pooled it
- Comparative Finite Element Analysis of Stress Concentration in Class V Lower Premolar Cavities Differently Restored by Adhesive Dental Materials.European journal of dentistry · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction The preservation of tooth structure during cavity preparation is crucial for maintaining tooth strength and longevity of restorations. The biomechanical behavior of teeth, especially those with mesio-occlusal-distal (MOD) cavity preparations, is significantly affected by the extent of cavity preparation and the type of restorative treatment employed. The aim of the current study was to evaluate and analyze the stress distribution seen in the mandibular molar with MOD cavity when restored with transverse post, using finite element analysis (FEA). Materials and methodology FEA was utilized to evaluate stress distribution in an endodontically treated mandibular first molar with MOD cavity preparation, restored using a transverse post and composite restoration. Three-dimensional models incorporating the tooth and the surrounding structures, along with the transverse post and composite restoration, were constructed based on known biomechanical properties. After meshing the models, loads were defined on the buccal and lingual cusps with a constant value of 600N and at an angle of 45 degrees. Preprocessing involved model preparation followed by postprocessing to obtain results representing the degree and type of stress distribution. Results FEA simulations revealed the distribution of stress within the tooth structure under functional occlusal forces. The transverse post system effectively reinforced the tooth by deflecting incident forces and providing uniform stress distribution. von Mises stresses were analyzed to assess the likelihood of material failure. The distribution of the stress in the restored tooth model was comparable to that seen in the intact model. Conclusion Transverse post along with composite restoration provides a conservative and cost-effective alternative to full coverage crowns while providing a functional and aesthetic outcome. Further research and clinical studies are warranted to validate these findings and optimize the clinical application of transverse post systems in restorative dentistry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.