ArticleCureus2024
The Clinical Incorporation of the 2017 Classification of Periodontal Disease Conditions Part II: The Association Between Clinical Parameters and Gender.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background The implementation of the new classification system guided clinicians in the best way for disease diagnosis and patient management. The advent of definitions such as clinical gingival health additionally helped in distinguishing between intact and reduced periodontium. The purpose behind introducing new systems was to guide practitioners to improve on managing the requirements of the patients effectively. It also enables professionals to concentrate on clinical practice, and it can be suggested that readers who are concentrating on research make use of the global classification system. In this study, we present a diagnostic approach for periodontal diseases that supports the innovative classification system in relation to gender while remaining compatible with previous guidelines. Aim The present study focuses on the relationship between gender association and the clinical parameters in periodontitis patients that would support the new classification system. Materials and methods This was a retrospective, cross-sectional, observational study consisting of patient data obtained from past patient records who were diagnosed with periodontitis. Results The data analysis results showed that 95% of the population was similarly distributed across the genders in terms of frequency, and there was minimal statistically significant difference between the genders when compared to the clinical parameters. However, there was a statistically significant difference in the specific clinical characteristics, such as recession, which impacted 48.6% of male patients, and the presence of local factors, which affected 43.2% of female patients, in addition to the 59.4% localized involvement of periodontitis. All the data were analyzed using the SPSS software version 20 (IBM SPSS Statistics, Armonk, NY). The chi-square test was used to evaluate the descriptive analysis and frequency tables. Conclusion The addition of correlating clinical parameters with data based on gender had no effect on the new classification system. Meanwhile, it can be used as an adjunct to evaluate the distribution and extent of disease progression among genders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.