Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39100012›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

The Outcome of Early Oral Feeding Following Elective Gastrointestinal Surgery.

Gm Ishtiaq Mahmud, Md Mahamudul Hasan, Mohammad Hasnat Hakim, Nahid Hasan Rifat, Md Atiqur Rahman Bhuiyan, Tariqul Islam, Mst Nahida Akter, Sabrina Rahman Mithila, Mir Manarat Bin Mokarram

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07016919 (Early vs Conventional Enteral Nutrition After Uncomplicated Paediatric Open appendectomy-a Randomised Control Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07016919 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Early vs Conventional Enteral Nutrition After Uncomplicated Paediatric Open appendectomy-a Randomised Control Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorShaikh Zayed Hospital, LahoreRan2025 to 2025Enrolled88ConditionsUncomplicated Acute Appendicitis in ChildrenArmsearly enteral nutrition, Conventional enteral nutrition
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Gm Ishtiaq MahmudSurgery, Sir Salimullah Medical College Mitford Hospital, Dhaka, BGD.
Md Mahamudul HasanSurgery, Rajshahi Medical College Hospital, Rajshahi, BGD.
Mohammad Hasnat HakimSurgery, Dhaka Medical College Hospital, Dhaka, BGD.
Nahid Hasan RifatUrology, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Dhaka, BGD.
Md Atiqur Rahman BhuiyanSurgery, Sir Salimullah Medical College Mitford Hospital, Dhaka, BGD.
Tariqul IslamSurgery, Ibn Sina Specialized Hospital, Dhaka, BGD.
Mst Nahida AkterSurgery, Kumudini Women's Medical College, Tangail, BGD.
Sabrina Rahman MithilaSurgery, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Dhaka, BGD.
Mir Manarat Bin MokarramSurgery, Ibn Sina Medical College, Dhaka, BGD.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Early oral feeding (EOF) after gastrointestinal (GI) surgery is an optimistic way to speed up recovery and shorten hospital stays, but its full effects remain unexplored. Aim This study aims to evaluate the outcomes of EOF in patients having elective gastrointestinal surgery. Methods This open-level, prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted in the Department of Surgery at Sir Salimullah Medical College Mitford Hospital, Dhaka, from March 2022 to February 2023. A total of 50 patients were enrolled and divided into two groups: early oral feeding (EOF) and traditional postoperative oral feeding (TOF), both before and after 48 hours of surgery, using a systematic random sampling technique. Informed written consent was taken from the patients. The patients were monitored on days 1, 3, 5, 7, 14, and 28 following surgeries. Postoperative complications, the duration for nasogastric tube (NGT) removal (days), the early recovery of bowel motility, and the length of the hospital stay (days) were noted. Results In this study, both EOF and TOF groups were found indifferent in terms of age distribution, gender ratio, or body mass index (BMI). However, significant differences emerged in postoperative outcomes. The TOF group experienced a significantly longer duration for nasogastric tube (NGT) removal and the initiation of oral feeding compared to the EOF group (P-value < 0.001). Complication rates, including nausea, vomiting, ileus, anastomotic leakage, wound infection, and pneumonia, did not exhibit statistically significant differences between the groups (P-value > 0.05). Moreover, the EOF group demonstrated an early recovery of bowel motility after surgery and shorter hospital stays compared to the TOF group (P-value < 0.05). Conclusion Starting oral feeding earlier does not increase complications. However, it does speed up recovery and shorten hospital stays.

Indexed as

early oral feeding (eof)gastrointestinal surgeryhospital staysrecoverytraditional postoperative oral feeding (tof)

Identifiers

PMID39100012
PMCPMC11297592

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.