ArticleCureus2024
Cost-Benefit Analysis of the CT of the Face in the Evaluation of Traumatic Facial Fractures in an Appalachian Tri-state Geriatric Population.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the cost vs. benefits of the CT face imaging study in the trauma workup of those over the age of 65.
methodsWe performed a retrospective chart review of 169 trauma patients in our trauma database aged 65 years or older who underwent a CT of the head, a CT of the face, or a CT of the head and CT of the face that resulted in findings of a facial fracture from 2017-2022. Injuries and the treatment they received were documented. If a patient underwent both a CT of the face and a CT of the head, then the author first viewed the CT of the head, documented any injury, and then recorded treatment based on the CT of the head. The CT of the face was then viewed, injuries were recorded, and treatment based on the CT of the face was documented. Statistical analysis was then performed using the paired T-test, McNemar test, and number needed to harm analysis.
resultsOf the 169 patients sampled, 159 underwent both CT of the head and the face. There were no patients who underwent a CT of the face exclusively, and only 10 patients underwent a CT of the head exclusively. Of the 159 that had both a CT of the head and the face, the average number of injuries noted on CT of the head + CT of the face vs. CT of the head was 2.42 vs. 1.36, P<.0.0001. The number needed to avoid missing a surgical facial fracture when only a CT of the head was obtained was 14.68.
conclusionThe risks of missing a surgical facial fracture outweigh the monetary, radiation, and patient-desired necessity benefits of only performing a CT of the head. A CT of the face should be included in the trauma workup for those over the age of 65 when facial fractures are suspected.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.