ArticleCureus2024
Patient-Reported Outcomes After Periodontal Surgical Procedures.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Interdisciplinary Management of Supracrestal Tissue Attachment Violation: A 5-Year Follow-Up Case Report.Case reports in dentistry · 2026Article
- Evaluation of Pain and Anxiety Levels After Periodontal Treatment.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Patient satisfaction is the primary focus of the healthcare system. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are standardized and valid measures obtained directly from the patients and are used to assess and compare the efficacy of healthcare services. This can help improve the service provided by the healthcare system. Therefore, this study aimed to assess PROMs during the first week post-surgery across different periodontal surgical procedures and explore their correlation with surgical duration. Furthermore, the study sought to evaluate the occurrence of postoperative complications. Methodology A total of 30 healthy patients with no systemic history, requiring periodontal surgical procedures such as crown lengthening (CLP), open flap debridement (OFD), and soft tissue grafting (STG) were included in the study. The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) was utilized for gathering PROMs concerning bleeding, swelling, bruising, and pain at intervals of days zero, three, five, and seven after the surgical procedure. Results On the surgical day and over seven days, VAS scores were the lowest for CLP and highest for STG procedures. This result is in accordance with the duration required for surgery. VAS scores for OFD were intermediate. Prevalence of 20% soft tissue graft dehiscence and 40% tenderness on palpation was observed. Swelling and bleeding were noticed in 10% and 20% of OFD cases. Conclusions One week post-surgically, the mean VAS scores were minimum for CLP, whereas maximum for STG procedures. As CLP and OFD require less duration compared to STG, duration plays a significant role in post-surgical outcomes. Prevalence of the post-surgical complications is also related to the duration of the surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.