ArticleIntelligent computing (Washington, D.C.)2024
Intelligent Beam Optimization for Light-Sheet Fluorescence Microscopy through Deep Learning.
Article in Intelligent computing (Washington, D.C.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advances in tissue optical clearing for 3D imaging in large animal.Frontiers of optoelectronics · 2025Review
- A physics-informed Airy beam learning framework for blockage avoidance in sub-terahertz wireless networks.Nature communications · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Light-sheet fluorescence microscopy (LSFM) provides the benefit of optical sectioning coupled with rapid acquisition times, enabling high-resolution 3-dimensional imaging of large tissue-cleared samples. Inherent to LSFM, the quality of the imaging heavily relies on the characteristics of the illumination beam, which only illuminates a thin section of the sample. Therefore, substantial efforts are dedicated to identifying slender, nondiffracting beam profiles that yield uniform and high-contrast images. An ongoing debate concerns the identification of optimal illumination beams for different samples: Gaussian, Bessel, Airy patterns, and/or others. However, comparisons among different beam profiles are challenging as their optimization objectives are often different. Given that our large imaging datasets (approximately 0.5 TB of images per sample) are already analyzed using deep learning models, we envisioned a different approach to the problem by designing an illumination beam tailored to boost the performance of the deep learning model. We hypothesized that integrating the physical LSFM illumination model (after passing it through a variable phase mask) into the training of a cell detection network would achieve this goal. Here, we report that joint optimization continuously updates the phase mask and results in improved image quality for better cell detection. The efficacy of our method is demonstrated through both simulations and experiments that reveal substantial enhancements in imaging quality compared to the traditional Gaussian light sheet. We discuss how designing microscopy systems through a computational approach provides novel insights for advancing optical design that relies on deep learning models for the analysis of imaging datasets.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.