Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39099879›Full record

ArticleIntelligent computing (Washington, D.C.)2024

Intelligent Beam Optimization for Light-Sheet Fluorescence Microscopy through Deep Learning.

Chen Li, Mani Ratnam Rai, Yuheng Cai, H Troy Ghashghaei, Alon Greenbaum

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Intelligent computing (Washington, D.C.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Chen LiJoint Department of Biomedical Engineering, North Carolina State University and University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA.
Mani Ratnam RaiJoint Department of Biomedical Engineering, North Carolina State University and University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA.
Yuheng CaiJoint Department of Biomedical Engineering, North Carolina State University and University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA.
H Troy GhashghaeiComparative Medicine Institute, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA.
Alon GreenbaumJoint Department of Biomedical Engineering, North Carolina State University and University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA.

Funding

Establishing the pig as a large animal model for studying drug delivery to the inner earR21DC020005 · NIDCD · NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY RALEIGH · PI GREENBAUM, ALON · 2022 to 2024
$570k
Clonal analysis of gliogenesis in the cerebral cortexR56NS117019 · NINDS · NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY RALEIGH · PI GHASHGHAEI, HOOMAN TROY · 2021 to 2021
$532k
High Throughput Clonal Analyses of Gliogenesis in Neocortical and Paleocortical areas of the Mouse BrainR21NS129093 · NINDS · NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY RALEIGH · PI GHASHGHAEI, HOOMAN TROY, GREENBAUM, ALON · 2022 to 2022
$412k
NIDCD NIH HHS R21 DC020005NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS129093NINDS NIH HHS R56 NS117019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Light-sheet fluorescence microscopy (LSFM) provides the benefit of optical sectioning coupled with rapid acquisition times, enabling high-resolution 3-dimensional imaging of large tissue-cleared samples. Inherent to LSFM, the quality of the imaging heavily relies on the characteristics of the illumination beam, which only illuminates a thin section of the sample. Therefore, substantial efforts are dedicated to identifying slender, nondiffracting beam profiles that yield uniform and high-contrast images. An ongoing debate concerns the identification of optimal illumination beams for different samples: Gaussian, Bessel, Airy patterns, and/or others. However, comparisons among different beam profiles are challenging as their optimization objectives are often different. Given that our large imaging datasets (approximately 0.5 TB of images per sample) are already analyzed using deep learning models, we envisioned a different approach to the problem by designing an illumination beam tailored to boost the performance of the deep learning model. We hypothesized that integrating the physical LSFM illumination model (after passing it through a variable phase mask) into the training of a cell detection network would achieve this goal. Here, we report that joint optimization continuously updates the phase mask and results in improved image quality for better cell detection. The efficacy of our method is demonstrated through both simulations and experiments that reveal substantial enhancements in imaging quality compared to the traditional Gaussian light sheet. We discuss how designing microscopy systems through a computational approach provides novel insights for advancing optical design that relies on deep learning models for the analysis of imaging datasets.

Identifiers

PMID39099879
PMCPMC11298055

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.