Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39099870›Full record

ReviewMedical science educator2024

Nursing Education During the SARS-COVID-19 Pandemic: The Implementation of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT).

Oriette Soto-Luffi, Cristian Villegas, Sharon Viscardi, Elizabeth Maria Ulloa-Inostroza

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Medical science educator, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Oriette Soto-LuffiFacultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad de las Américas, Santiago, Chile.ORCID 0000-0002-7137-6676
Cristian VillegasGrupo de Investigación Educativa en Formación Inicial Docente (GIEFID), Universidad de Las Américas, Santiago, Chile.ORCID 0000-0001-6224-8974
Sharon ViscardiNúcleo de Investigación en Producción Alimentaria, Universidad Católica de Temuco, Temuco, Chile.ORCID 0000-0002-5018-4122
Elizabeth Maria Ulloa-InostrozaLaboratorio de Fisiología Vegetal Aplicada, Universidad de Aysén, Coyhaique, Chile.ORCID 0000-0002-2275-2102

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the pandemic, nursing programs found a way to continue the training process through virtual classrooms and technological tools to support the teaching and learning process. The aim of the present research was to analyze the existing literature on the methodologies and technologies used in nursing education during the pandemic. Methods and results, in this context, were integrative review of the literature through the SciELO, PubMed, CUIDEN, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL (EBSCO), Redalyc, and Dialnet databases, by running a search on the use of the keywords "nursing students," "new technology," and "pandemic," for literature published between 2020 and 2022. As a search strategy, the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) flowchart was used. Finally, the virtualization of nursing teaching has been positive in giving continuity to the training process, and student learning has been verified. However, there is evidence that some actions and skills are not possible at the moment with the available methodologies and tools and still require attendance for some practical activities.

Indexed as

Clinical studentsNew technology in educationNursing students

Identifiers

PMID39099870
PMCPMC11297002

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.