Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39099846›Full record

ReviewBiophysical reviews2024

DNA simulation benchmarks revealed with the accumulation of high-resolution structures.

Wilma K Olson, Robert T Young, Luke Czapla

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biophysical reviews, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Wilma K OlsonRutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ USA.
Robert T YoungRutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ USA.
Luke CzaplaRutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ USA.

Funding

THEORETICFAL ASPECTS OF DNA SUPERCOILINGR01GM034809 · NIGMS · RUTGERS THE ST UNIV OF NJ NEW BRUNSWICK · PI OLSON, WILMA K · 1985 to 2019
$4.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM034809
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA carries more than the list of biochemical instructions that drive the basic functions of living systems. The sequence of base pairs includes a multitude of structural and energetic signals that determine the degree to which the long, threadlike molecule moves and how it responds to proteins and other molecules involved in its processing and packaging. The arrangements of successive base pairs in high-resolution protein-DNA crystal structures provide useful benchmarks for atomic-level simulations of double-helical DNA as well as information potentially useful in interpreting the properties of specific DNA sequences. The set of currently available structures has enough examples to characterize the conformational preferences of the DNA base-pair steps within the context of their immediate neighbors, i.e., in the context of tetramers, and reveals surprising effects of certain neighbors on local chain properties. The proteins in contact with DNA present various microenvironments that sense and/or induce the observed spatial forms. The cumulative buildup of amino-acid atoms in different protein-DNA complexes produces a binding cloud around the double helix with subtle sequence-dependent features. While the microenvironment presented by each protein to DNA is highly unique, the overall composition of amino-acid atoms within close range of DNA in a broad collection of structures is fairly uniform. The buildup of protein atoms of different types around the DNA provides new information for the improvement of nucleic acid force fields and fresh ideas for the exploration of the properties of DNA in solution.

Indexed as

DNA benchmarksDNA deformabilityDNA microenvironmentDNA sequence-dependent structureProtein-DNA interactions

Identifiers

PMID39099846
PMCPMC11297015

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.