Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39099774›Full record

ArticleJACC. Advances2024

Feasibility of a Novel Augmented 6-Minute Incremental Step Test: A Simplified Cardiorespiratory Fitness Assessment Tool.

Jeroen Molinger, Veraprapas Kittipibul, J Matthew Gray, Vishal N Rao, Stratton Barth, Ashley Swavely, Brian Coyne, Aubrie Coburn, Jan Bakker, Paul E Wischmeyer and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JACC. Advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Jeroen MolingerDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Veraprapas KittipibulDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
J Matthew GrayDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Vishal N RaoDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Stratton BarthHuman Pharmacology & Physiology Lab, Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Ashley SwavelyDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Brian CoyneDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Aubrie CoburnDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Jan BakkerDepartment of Intensive Care Adults, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Paul E WischmeyerDivision of Critical Care, Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Cynthia L GreenDuke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
David MacLeodHuman Pharmacology & Physiology Lab, Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Manesh PatelDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Marat FudimDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) is considered a gold standard in assessing cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) but has limited accessibility due to competency requirements and cost. Incorporating portable sensor devices into a simple bedside test of CRF could improve diagnostic and prognostic value. Objectives: The authors sought to evaluate the association of an augmented 6-minute incremental step test (6MIST) with standard CPET. Methods: We enrolled patients undergoing clinically indicated supine cycle ergometry CPET with invasive hemodynamics (iCPET) for the same-day 6MIST. CRF-related variables were simultaneously recorded using a signal morphology-based impedance cardiograph (PhysioFlow Enduro) and a portable metabolic analyzer (VO Results: Fifteen patients (mean age 60 ± 14 years, 40% female, 27% Black) were included. All patients who agreed to undergo 6MIST completed the study without any test-related adverse events. We observed good to excellent correlation between iCPET- and 6MIST-measured CPET parameters: peak heart rate (ICC = 0.60; 95% CI: 0.15-0.85), absolute peak O Conclusions: We demonstrate the feasibility of a novel augmented 6MIST with wearable devices for simultaneous CPET and hemodynamic assessment. 6MIST-measured CPET parameters were strongly correlated with the iCPET-derived measurements. Additional studies are needed to confirm the validity of the 6MIST compared to standard upright CPET.

Indexed as

6-minute incremental step testcardiopulmonary exercise testcardiorespiratory fitnesswearable devices

Identifiers

PMID39099774
PMCPMC11294698

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.