Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39099761›Full record

ArticleCancer management and research2024

Predictive Value of PERCIST for Locally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated with Preoperative Induction Therapy - A Multicenter Study in Japan.

Katsuhiko Shimizu, Masao Nakata, Shinsuke Saisho, Masayuki Inubushi, Norihito Okumura, Tomohiro Murakawa, Motohiro Yamashita, Hiroshige Nakamura, Yoshifumi Sano, Kazuhiko Kataoka and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer management and research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Katsuhiko ShimizuDepartment of General Thoracic Surgery, Kawasaki Medical School, Kurashiki, Japan.
Masao NakataDepartment of General Thoracic Surgery, Kawasaki Medical School, Kurashiki, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-8677-7336
Shinsuke SaishoDepartment of General Thoracic Surgery, Kawasaki Medical School, Kurashiki, Japan.
Masayuki InubushiDivision of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, Kawasaki Medical School, Kurashiki, Japan.
Norihito OkumuraDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Kurashiki Central Hospital, Kurashiki, Japan.
Tomohiro MurakawaDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Kansai Medical University, Osaka, Japan.
Motohiro YamashitaDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Shikoku Cancer Center, Matsuyama, Japan.
Hiroshige NakamuraDivision of General Thoracic Surgery, Tottori University Hospital, Yonago, Japan.
Yoshifumi SanoDepartment of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Toon, Japan.
Kazuhiko KataokaDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, National Hospital Organization Iwakuni Clinical Center, Iwakuni, Japan.
Shinichi ToyookaDepartment of General Thoracic Surgery and Breast and Endocrinological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University, Okayama, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Induction therapy followed by surgery is recommended as an alternative treatment strategy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients who achieve pathologic response after induction therapy have better outcomes than non-responders; therefore, therapeutic response must be evaluated. Recently, new approaches for monitoring therapeutic responses, which are based on Methods: A total of 130 patients in the Setouchi Lung Cancer Group who underwent FDG-PET imaging before and after induction therapy prior to a planned surgical resection for NSCLC between 2007 and 2016 were studied retrospectively. The pathologic responses of the primary lung tumors and metastatic lymph nodes were compared with their responses based on evaluation using PERCIST. Results: Postoperative pathologic studies revealed pathologic complete response (pCR) in 42 (32.3%) patients. PERCIST was significantly correlated with pathologic response (p < 0.001). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of PERCIST for predicting pCR were 16.7% (7/42), 88.6% (78/88), and 65.4% (85/130), respectively. Patients with pCR had significantly higher reduction rates in SULpeak for both primary lung tumors and metastatic lymph nodes and TLG for primary tumors than non-responders. In a multivariate Cox regression analysis, tumor site in upper lobes, reduction rate of TLG in primary tumor, and pathologic N0 were independent predictors of favorable recurrence-free survival (RFS). Conclusion: Our study suggested that PERCIST, especially the rate of TLG reduction rate, are useful to predict the pathological response and prognosis after induction therapy. Although improvement is necessary, PERCIST can be a promising method of the post-induction status in lung cancer. Further research is needed to confirm our findings.

Indexed as

FDG PETnon-small cell lung cancerPERCISTSULTLG

Identifiers

PMID39099761
PMCPMC11297483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.