Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39099733›Full record

ArticleJFMS open reports

Surgical management of a lumbar far lateral intervertebral disc extrusion in a cat.

Gilad Fefer, Lauren Bynum, Peter Early

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in JFMS open reports. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Gilad FeferDepartment of Clinical Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9837-7188
Lauren BynumDepartment of Clinical Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, USA.
Peter EarlyDepartment of Clinical Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Case summary: A 9-year-old male castrated domestic shorthair cat was presented with a 2-week history of acute, progressive left pelvic limb lameness. Gait evaluation revealed a grade 3/5 left pelvic limb lameness with no apparent orthopedic cause for the lameness based on orthopedic examination or radiographs. The neurological examination was otherwise normal. MRI revealed a left-sided L6-7 far lateral intervertebral disc extrusion with possible secondary neuritis of the L6 spinal nerve. A left-sided L6-7 foraminotomy was performed to remove the extruded disc material and provide additional space for the significantly enlarged nerve root. An L6-7 fenestration was also performed. The patient made an excellent recovery with near-complete resolution of lameness at 26 days postoperatively. Relevance and novel information: This case report contributes to the growing body of literature on lateral intervertebral disc extrusion as an etiological factor in pelvic limb lameness in cats, particularly when neurological deficits are absent. Furthermore, the case report highlights the diagnostic utility of cross-sectional advanced imaging for cats with lameness for which an orthopedic or radiographic cause cannot be identified. Finally, this case underscores the efficacy of surgical intervention as a treatment option for cats with lumbar far lateral intervertebral disc extrusions that do not improve with medical management alone. This finding could have implications for future surgical approaches in cats with similar findings.

Indexed as

foraminalForaminotomyintervertebral disc extrusionlamenesssurgery

Identifiers

PMID39099733
PMCPMC11297504

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.