ArticleHardwareX2024
Design, manufacture, and control of a low-cost positive airway pressure device.
Article in HardwareX, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Current positive airway pressure devices cost NZ$800-$2500, posing a financial barrier for the estimated 1 billion individuals worldwide with sleep apnea and those researching respiratory diseases. Increasing diagnoses and research interest in the area necessitate a low-cost, easily accessible alternative. Thus, the mePAP, a high-quality, multipurpose, low-cost (∼NZ$250) positive airway pressure device, was designed and prototyped specifically for respiratory disease research, particularly for sleep apnea. The mePAP allows user customization and provides researchers with an affordable tool for testing positive airway pressure algorithms. Unlike typical commercial devices, the mePAP offers adaptability with open-source data collection and easily modifiable software for implementing and analysing different control and diagnostic algorithms. It features three control modes: constant; bilevel; and automatic; and provides pressures from 4 to 20 cmH2O, controlled via a phone app through Wi-Fi, with a mini-sensor added at the mask for increased accuracy. Validation tests showed the mePAP's performance is comparable to a gold-standard Fisher & Paykel device, with extremely similar output pressures. The mePAP's low cost enhances accessibility and equity, allowing researchers to test ventilation algorithms for sleep apnea and other respiratory conditions, with all data openly available for analysis. Its adaptability and multiple applications increase its usability and usefulness across various research and clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.