Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39099685›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2024

Prediction of lateral lymph node metastasis in rectal cancer patients based on MRI using clinical, deep transfer learning, radiomic, and fusion models.

Yi Sun, Zhongxiang Lu, Hongjie Yang, Peishi Jiang, Zhichun Zhang, Jiafei Liu, Yuanda Zhou, Peng Li, Qingsheng Zeng, Yu Long and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Yi SunNankai University, Tianjin, China.
Zhongxiang LuThe First Clinical College of Medicine, Gansu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, Gansu, China.
Hongjie YangNankai University, Tianjin, China.
Peishi JiangNankai University, Tianjin, China.
Zhichun ZhangNankai University, Tianjin, China.
Jiafei LiuNankai University, Tianjin, China.
Yuanda ZhouNankai University, Tianjin, China.
Peng LiNankai University, Tianjin, China.
Qingsheng ZengNankai University, Tianjin, China.
Yu LongNankai University, Tianjin, China.
Laiyuan LiGansu Provincial Hospital, Gansu Clinical Medical Research Center for Anorectal Diseases, Lanzhou, Gansu, China.
Binbin DuGansu Provincial Hospital, Gansu Clinical Medical Research Center for Anorectal Diseases, Lanzhou, Gansu, China.
Xipeng ZhangNankai University, Tianjin, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Lateral lymph node (LLN) metastasis in rectal cancer significantly affects patient treatment and prognosis. This study aimed to comprehensively compare the performance of various predictive models in predicting LLN metastasis. Methods: In this retrospective study, data from 152 rectal cancer patients who underwent lateral lymph node (LLN) dissection were collected. The cohort was divided into a training set (n=86) from Tianjin Union Medical Center (TUMC), and two testing cohorts: testing cohort (TUMC) (n=37) and testing cohort from Gansu Provincial Hospital (GSPH) (n=29). A clinical model was established using clinical data; deep transfer learning models and radiomics models were developed using MRI images of the primary tumor (PT) and largest short-axis LLN (LLLN), visible LLN (VLLN) areas, along with a fusion model that integrates features from both deep transfer learning and radiomics. The diagnostic value of these models for LLN metastasis was analyzed based on postoperative LLN pathology. Results: Models based on LLLN image information generally outperformed those based on PT image information. Rradiomics models based on LLLN demonstrated improved robustness on external testing cohorts compared to those based on VLLN. Specifically, the radiomics model based on LLLN imaging achieved an AUC of 0.741 in the testing cohort (TUMC) and 0.713 in the testing cohort (GSPH) with the extra trees algorithm. Conclusion: Data from LLLN is a more reliable basis for predicting LLN metastasis in rectal cancer patients with suspicious LLN metastasis than data from PT. Among models performing adequately on the internal test set, all showed declines on the external test set, with LLLN_Rad_Models being less affected by scanning parameters and data sources.

Indexed as

deep transfer learninglateral lymph node metastasispredictive modelradiomicsrectal cancer

Identifiers

PMID39099685
PMCPMC11294238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.