ArticleJournal of biomedical optics2024
DermoGAN: multi-task cycle generative adversarial networks for unsupervised automatic cell identification on
Article in Journal of biomedical optics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- DermoGAN: multi-task cycle generative adversarial networks for unsupervised automatic cell identification onJournal of biomedical optics · 2024Article
- Automatic granular and spinous epidermal cell identification and analysis onJournal of biomedical optics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Significance: Accurate identification of epidermal cells on reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) images is important in the study of epidermal architecture and topology of both healthy and diseased skin. However, analysis of these images is currently done manually and therefore time-consuming and subject to human error and inter-expert interpretation. It is also hindered by low image quality due to noise and heterogeneity. Aim: We aimed to design an automated pipeline for the analysis of the epidermal structure from RCM images. Approach: Two attempts have been made at automatically localizing epidermal cells, called keratinocytes, on RCM images: the first is based on a rotationally symmetric error function mask, and the second on cell morphological features. Here, we propose a dual-task network to automatically identify keratinocytes on RCM images. Each task consists of a cycle generative adversarial network. The first task aims to translate real RCM images into binary images, thus learning the noise and texture model of RCM images, whereas the second task maps Gabor-filtered RCM images into binary images, learning the epidermal structure visible on RCM images. The combination of the two tasks allows one task to constrict the solution space of the other, thus improving overall results. We refine our cell identification by applying the pre-trained StarDist algorithm to detect star-convex shapes, thus closing any incomplete membranes and separating neighboring cells. Results: The results are evaluated both on simulated data and manually annotated real RCM data. Accuracy is measured using recall and precision metrics, which is summarized as the Conclusions: We demonstrate that the proposed fully unsupervised method successfully identifies keratinocytes on RCM images of the epidermis, with an accuracy on par with experts' cell identification, is not constrained by limited available annotated data, and can be extended to images acquired using various imaging techniques without retraining.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.