Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39099593›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2024

Pilot multicenter study to determine the utility of point-of-care ultrasound to predict difficulty of tracheal intubation using videolaryngoscopy with the McGrath™ Mac videolaryngoscope.

Miguel A Fernández-Vaquero, Nekari De Luis-Cabezón, Miguel A García-Aroca, Jose M Álvarez-Avello, Marc Vives-Santacana, Robert Greif, Eugenio D Martinez-Hurtado, Diana Ly-Liu

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07444528 (Upper Airway Ultrasound to Predict Difficult Airway Management in Neonates and Infants), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07444528 enrolling by invitationnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Upper Airway Ultrasound to Predict Difficult Airway Management in Neonates and Infants: A Prospective Observational Study

TypeobservationalSponsorChildren's Hospital of PhiladelphiaRan2026 to 2027Enrolled180ConditionsNeonates, Infants Aged 0 Days to 12 Months Scheduled for Elective SurgeryArmsUpper airway ultrasound
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Observational
  3. Observational
  4. Observational
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Miguel A Fernández-VaqueroDepartment of Anesthesiology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Madrid, Spain.
Nekari De Luis-CabezónDepartment of Anesthesiology, Basurto University Hospital, Bilbao, Spain.
Miguel A García-ArocaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Madrid, Spain.
Jose M Álvarez-AvelloDepartment of Anesthesiology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Madrid, Spain.
Marc Vives-SantacanaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Robert GreifSchool of Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Eugenio D Martinez-HurtadoDepartment of Anesthesiology, Infanta Leonor University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Diana Ly-LiuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Basurto University Hospital, Bilbao, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Clinical airway screening tests used to predict difficulties during airway management have low sensitivity and specificity. Point-of-care airway ultrasound has described measurements related to problems with difficult direct laryngoscopy. Nevertheless, the correlation between ultrasound parameters and videolaryngoscopy has not been published yet. The aim of this multicenter, prospective observational pilot study was to evaluate the applicability of clinical parameters and ultrasound measurements to find potential tracheal intubation difficulties when videolaryngoscopy is used. Methods: Preoperatively, six clinical airway assessments were performed: (1) modified Mallampati score, (2) thyromental distance, (3) sternomental distance, (4) interincisal distance, (5) upper lip bite test, and (6) neck circumference. Six ultrasound parameters were measured in awake patients: (1) distance from skin to hyoid bone, (2) distance from skin to epiglottis, (3) hyomental distance in neutral head position, (4) hyomental distance in head-extended position, (5) distance from skin to the deepest part of the palate, and (6) sagittal tongue area. And finally, there was one ultrasound measure obtained in anesthetized patients, the compressed sagittal tongue area during videolaryngoscopy. The difficulty for tracheal intubation using a McGrath™ Mac videolaryngoscope, the percentage of glottic opening, and Cormack-Lehane grade were also assessed. Results: In this cohort of 119 subjects, tongue dimensions, particularly the sagittal tongue area, showed a robust association with increased intubation difficulty using videolaryngoscopy. A multiparametric model combining the following three ultrasound variables in awake patients: (a) the distance from skin to epiglottis, (b) the distance from skin to the deepest part of the palate, and (c) the sagittal tongue area, yielded a sensitivity of 92.3%, specificity of 94.5%, positive predictive value of 82.8%, and negative predictive value of 97.8% ( Conclusion: Point-of-care airway ultrasound emerges as a more useful tool compared to traditional clinical scales to anticipate possible challenges during videolaryngoscopic intubation.

Indexed as

airway managementtracheal intubationultrasonographyvideo-assisted techniquesvideolaryngoscopy

Identifiers

PMID39099593
PMCPMC11294227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.