Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39099577›Full record

ArticleEuropean heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology2024

The budget impact of implementing atrial fibrillation-screening in European countries.

Michaela Eklund, Lars Bernfort, Kajsa Appelberg, Daniel Engler, Renate B Schnabel, Carlos Martinez, Christopher Wallenhorst, Giuseppe Boriani, Claire M Buckley, Søren Zöga Diederichsen and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Systematic, randomized atrial fibrillation screening using detailed phenotyping with a risk prediction model combined with patch electrocardiogram in a Swedish population aged 65 years or older: the CONSIDERING-AF trial.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025
    Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Michaela EklundUnit of Healthcare Analysis, Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-7931-8941
Lars BernfortUnit of Healthcare Analysis, Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0537-3319
Kajsa AppelbergUnit of Healthcare Analysis, Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Daniel EnglerDepartment of Cardiology, University Heart & Vascular Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9519-6258
Renate B SchnabelDepartment of Cardiology, University Heart & Vascular Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7170-9509
Carlos MartinezInstitute for Epidemiology, Statistics and Informatics GmbH, Frankfurt, Germany.
Christopher WallenhorstInstitute for Epidemiology, Statistics and Informatics GmbH, Frankfurt, Germany.
Giuseppe BorianiCardiology Division, Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, Italy University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Policlinico di Modena, Modena, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9820-4815
Claire M BuckleySchool of Public Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Søren Zöga DiederichsenDepartment of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Inge Lehmanns Vej 7, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jesper Hastrup SvendsenDepartment of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Inge Lehmanns Vej 7, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Joan MontanerNeurovascular Research Laboratory, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Research (VHIR) Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Tatjana PotparaMedical Faculty, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6285-6902
Lars-Åke LevinUnit of Healthcare Analysis, Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2581-4863
Johan LythUnit of Healthcare Analysis, Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4988-6346

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A budget impact analysis estimates the short-term difference between the cost of the current treatment strategy and a new treatment strategy, in this case to implement population screening for atrial fibrillation (AF). The aim of this study is to estimate the financial impact of implementing population-based AF-screening of 75-year-olds compared with the current setting of no screening from a healthcare payer perspective in eight European countries. The net budget impact of AF-screening was estimated in country-specific settings for Denmark, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Netherlands, Serbia, Spain, and Sweden. Country-specific parameters were used to allow for variations in healthcare systems and to reflect the healthcare sector in the country of interest. Similar results can be seen in all countries AF-screening incurs savings of stroke-related costs since AF treatment reduces the number of strokes. However, the increased number of detected AF and higher drug acquisition will increase the drug costs as well as the costs of physician- and control visits. The net budget impact per invited varied from €10 in Ireland to €122 in the Netherlands. The results showed the increased costs of implementing AF-screening were mainly driven by increased drug costs and screening costs. In conclusion, across Europe, though the initial cost of screening and more frequent use of oral anti-coagulants will increase the healthcare payers' costs, introducing population screening for AF will result in savings of stroke-related costs.

Indexed as

AnticoagulationAtrial fibrillationBudget impact analysisECG monitoringScreeningStroke prevention

Identifiers

PMID39099577
PMCPMC11292408

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.