Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39099537›Full record

ArticleTrends in hearing

A Step Toward Precision Audiology: Individual Differences and Characteristic Profiles From Auditory Perceptual and Cognitive Abilities.

Dana Cherri, David A Eddins, Erol J Ozmeral

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Trends in hearing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Dana CherriDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1116-4046
David A EddinsDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA.
Erol J OzmeralDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9529-001X

Funding

Efficient diagnostic tools to evaluate central auditory dysfunctionR01DC015051 · NIDCD · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI EDDINS, DAVID A., GALLUN, FREDERICK J. · 2016 to 2020
$2.3M
A multi-modal streaming approach to understanding aided speech perception in noise: discovering relationships between device limitations, perceptual abilities, and neuro-modulation of feature codingR21DC017832 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA · PI OZMERAL, EROL JAMES · 2020 to 2022
$449k
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC015051NIDCD NIH HHS R21 DC017832
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Older adults with normal hearing or with age-related hearing loss face challenges when listening to speech in noisy environments. To better serve individuals with communication difficulties, precision diagnostics are needed to characterize individuals' auditory perceptual and cognitive abilities beyond pure tone thresholds. These abilities can be heterogenous across individuals within the same population. The goal of the present study is to consider the suprathreshold variability and develop characteristic profiles for older adults with normal hearing (ONH) and with hearing loss (OHL). Auditory perceptual and cognitive abilities were tested on ONH (

Indexed as

Audiometry, Pure-ToneAuditory ThresholdCognitionNoisePerceptual MaskingSpeech PerceptionAcoustic StimulationAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsAudiologyAudiometry, SpeechAuditory PerceptionCase-Control StudiesCluster AnalysisFemaleagingauditory profilecognitionhearing lossindividual differencespsychoacoustics

Identifiers

PMID39099537
PMCPMC11301744

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.