Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39099512›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of health policy and management2024

Pakistan's Progress on Universal Health Coverage: Lessons Learned in Priority Setting and Challenges Ahead in Reinforcing Primary Healthcare.

Ala Alwan, Dean T Jamison, Sameen Siddiqi, Anna Vassall

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of health policy and management, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ala AlwanDCP3 Country Translation Project, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID 0009-0006-7054-3328
Dean T JamisonUniversity of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Sameen SiddiqiDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0001-8289-0964
Anna VassallGlobal Health Economics Centre, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2911-1375

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pakistan developed an essential package of health services at the primary healthcare (PHC) level as a key component of health reforms aiming to achieve universal health coverage (UHC). This supplement describes the methods and processes adopted for evidence-informed prioritization of services, policy decisions adopted, and the lessons learned in package design as well as in the transition to effective rollout. The papers conclude that evidence-informed deliberative processes can be effectively applied to design affordable packages of services that represent good value for money and address a major part of the disease burden. Transition to implementation requires a comprehensive assessment of health system gaps, strong engagement of the planning and financing sectors, serious involvement of key national stakeholders and the private health sector, capacity building, and institutionalization of technical and managerial skills. Pakistan's experience highlights the need for updating the evidence and model packages of the Disease Control Priorities 3 (DCP3) initiative and reinforcing international collaboration to support technical guidance to countries in priority setting and UHC reforms.

Indexed as

Health Care ReformHealth PolicyHealth PrioritiesPrimary Health CareUniversal Health InsuranceHumansPakistanDisease Control PrioritiesEPHSEssential Health PackagePakistanPrimary HealthcareUniversal Health Coverage

Identifiers

PMID39099512
PMCPMC11607522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.