Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39099505›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of health policy and management2024

Equity Lens on Canada's COVID-19 Response: Review of the Literature.

Muhammad Haaris Tiwana, Julia Smith, Megan Kirby, Simran Purewal

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of health policy and management, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Muhammad Haaris TiwanaFaculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1344-6565
Julia SmithFaculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5175-1109
Megan KirbyDepartment of History, Faculty of Liberal Arts & Professional Studies, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1220-7370
Simran PurewalFaculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3724-4327

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA growing literature has documented how the secondary effects of the COVID-19 pandemic have compounded socioeconomic vulnerabilities already present in society, particularly across social categories such as gender, race, class, and socioeconomic status. Such effects demonstrate how pandemic response policies act as structural determinants of health to influence not only direct health outcomes but also intermediary outcomes, such as access to education or income.

methodsThis review aims to scope research that analyzes pandemic response policies in Canada from an equity perspective, to identify common themes, recommendations, and gaps.

resultsFourteen studies were thematically analyzed, the majority being qualitative policy document analysis, applying critical frameworks and focused on effects on select priority populations. Analysis of economic and labour policies indicates a lack of consideration for the specific needs of priority populations, and those engaged in precarious, informal, and essential labour. Analysis of social policies illustrate the wide-ranging effects of school and service closures, particularly on women and children. Furthermore, these policies lacked consideration of populations marginalized during the pandemic, include older adults and their caregivers, as well as lack of consideration of the diversity of Indigenous communities. Recommendations proposed in this review call for developing policy responses that address persistent social and economic inequities, pandemic response policies tailored to the needs of priority populations and more meaningful consultation during policy development.

conclusionThe limited number of studies suggests there is still much scope for research recognizing policies as structural determinants of health inequities, including research which takes an intersectional approach.

Indexed as

COVID-19CanadaHealth EquityHealth PolicyHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2Social Determinants of HealthSocioeconomic FactorsCanadaCOVID-19Equity-FocusPandemic PreparednessPolicy PlanningVulnerable Populations

Identifiers

PMID39099505
PMCPMC11270619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.