Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39099446›Full record

ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry. A2024

Predicting Selectivity with a Bifurcating Surface: Inaccurate Model or Inaccurate Statistics of Dynamics?

Kai-Yuan Kuan, Chao-Ping Hsu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of physical chemistry. A, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Solvent Effects on the Selectivity of Ambimodal Dipolar/Diels-Alder Cycloadditions: A Study Using Explicit Solvation Models.Chemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kai-Yuan KuanInstitute of Chemistry, Academia Sinica, 128 Academia Road, Section 2, Nankang, Taipei 11529, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-1118-9254
Chao-Ping HsuInstitute of Chemistry, Academia Sinica, 128 Academia Road, Section 2, Nankang, Taipei 11529, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-7187-427X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reactions on post-transition-state bifurcation (PTSB) energy surfaces are an important class of reaction in which classical rate theories, such as the transition state theory, fail to account for the selectivity. Quasiclassical trajectory molecular dynamic (QCT-MD) simulation is an important computational approach to understanding reactions mechanisms, especially for reactions that cannot be predicted from conventional rate theories. However, the applicability of direct dynamic simulations is hampered by huge computational costs for collecting a statistically meaningful set of trajectories, making it difficult to compare simulation results with theoretical or physical insights-based predictions (non-MD predictions). In this work, we examine the PTSB of Schmidt-Aubé reactions studied by Tantillo and co-workers. With machine-learning using kernel-ridge regression (KRR) to predict atomic forces, statistical reliability was enhanced by significantly increasing the number of trajectories. With KRR, the bottleneck of simulating dynamics (atomic forces in QCT-MD with density functional theory) was accelerated more than 100-fold. We found that this KRR-aided QCT-MD approach is successful in predicting branching ratios with a much larger number of trajectories. With our approach, statistical errors are greatly reduced, and hypothetical non-MD models for predicting selectivity are tested with much higher confidence. By comparison with non-MD models, dynamical properties that affect branching ratios become more clearly described.

Identifiers

PMID39099446
PMCPMC11331512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.