Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39099173›Full record

ArticleInternational wound journal2024

Assessing health-related quality of life using the Wound-QoL-17 and the Wound-QoL-14-Results of the cross-sectional European HAQOL study using item response theory.

Toni Maria Janke, Vlastimil Kozon, Skaidra Valiukeviciene, Laura Rackauskaite, Adam Reich, Katarzyna Stępień, Pavel Chernyshov, Monika Jankechova, Catherine van Montfrans, Stella Amesz and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International wound journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Lesional pruritus in pyoderma gangrenosum: Present but not predominant.JID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Toni Maria JankeInstitute for Health Services Research in Dermatology and Nursing (IVDP), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9861-9519
Vlastimil KozonSociety Wound Diagnosis and Wound Management Austria, Vienna Medical Academy, Vienna, Austria.
Skaidra ValiukevicieneDepartment of Dermatology and Venereology, Hospital of Lithuanian University of Health Sciences Kauno Klinikos, Kaunas, Lithuania.
Laura RackauskaiteDepartment of Dermatology and Venereology, Hospital of Lithuanian University of Health Sciences Kauno Klinikos, Kaunas, Lithuania.
Adam ReichDepartment of Dermatology, Institute of Medical Sciences, Medical College of Rzeszów University, Rzeszów, Poland.
Katarzyna StępieńDepartment of Dermatology, Institute of Medical Sciences, Medical College of Rzeszów University, Rzeszów, Poland.
Pavel ChernyshovDepartment of Dermatology and Venereology, Bogomolets National Medical University, Kiev, Ukraine.
Monika JankechovaFaculty of Health and Social Work St. Ladislaw in Nove Zamky, St. Elizabeth University of Health and Social Work, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Catherine van MontfransDepartment of Dermatology, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Stella AmeszDepartment of Health Sciences, Section of Nursing Science, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Marjam BaryschDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Elena Conde MonteroHospital Universitario Infanta Leonor, Madrid, Spain.
Matthias AugustinInstitute for Health Services Research in Dermatology and Nursing (IVDP), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4026-8728
Christine BlomeInstitute for Health Services Research in Dermatology and Nursing (IVDP), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany.
Catharina C Braren-von StülpnagelInstitute for Health Services Research in Dermatology and Nursing (IVDP), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6269-5125

Funding

European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (EADV)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For assessing health-related quality of life in patients with chronic wounds, the Wound-QoL questionnaire has been developed. Two different versions exist: the Wound-QoL-17 and the Wound-QoL-14. For international and cross-cultural comparisons, it is necessary to demonstrate psychometric properties in an international study. Therefore, the aim of this study was to test both questionnaires in a European sample, using item response theory (IRT). Participants were recruited in eight European countries. Item characteristic curves (ICC), item information curves (IIC) and differential item functioning (DIF) were calculated. In both questionnaires, ICCs for most items were well-ordered and sufficiently distinct. For items, in which adjacent response categories were not sufficiently distinct, response options were merged. IICs showed that items on sleep and on pain, on worries as well as on day-to-day and leisure activities had considerably high informational value. In the Wound-QoL-14, the item on social activities showed DIFs regarding the country and age. The same applied for the Wound-QoL-17, in which also the item on stairs showed DIFs regarding age. Our study showed comparable results across both versions of the Wound-QoL. We established a new scoring method, which could be applied in international research projects. For clinical practice, the original scoring can be maintained.

Indexed as

PsychometricsQuality of LifeWounds and InjuriesAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChronic DiseaseCross-Sectional StudiesEuropeFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and Questionnaireschronic woundshealth‐related quality of lifeIRTitem response theoryWound‐QoL

Identifiers

PMID39099173
PMCPMC11298544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.