ArticleIrish journal of medical science2024
Analyzing quality of life after low anterior resection for rectal cancer.
Article in Irish journal of medical science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRectal cancer is one of the most common cancers worldwide that imposes high costs on patients and the healthcare system while also having a significant impact on the patient's quality of life (QoL).
aimWe aimed to assess the QoL of rectal cancer patients undergoing lower anterior resection (LAR) and evaluate potential confounding factors.
methodsIn this cross-sectional study, we included patients undergoing neo-adjuvant chemotherapy followed by LAR, diverting ileostomy, and adjuvant chemotherapy. Six months after stoma reversal, QoL was assessed using a cancer-specific core questionnaire EORTC QLQ-C30 and also a colorectal cancer module EORTC QLQ-CR29. Linear and quantile regression models were used to examine associations of QoL and patients' demographical and clinical features.
resultsThe study population comprised 210 patients with an average age of 61.9 ± 11.0 (range: 37-85) and 112 (53.3%) male patients. The higher tumor stage increases the QoL of patients by reducing diarrhea, loss of appetite, defecation problems, and stool frequency. Based on the linear regression analysis, a farther distance of the anastomosis from the anal verge (AV) was correlated with lower symptom scores and higher QoL. Also, at the 75th percentile cut-off of the QLQ-CR29 scores, a higher N stage of the tumor was correlated with higher QoL based on functional subscale (coefficient = 3.032, P = 0.016).
conclusionsQoL of patients after LAR for rectal cancer is significantly associated with the distance of the anastomosis site from the AV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39098985What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.