ArticleScientific reports2024
Comparison of ovarian mRNA expression levels in wild and hatchery-produced greater amberjack Seriola dumerili.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- New insights into SREB orphan receptor roles in the ovary, using comparative transcriptomics across 3 fishes.Endocrinology · 2026Article
- Telomere-to-telomere genome assemblies of male and female greater amberjack (Seriola dumerili).Scientific data · 2026Article
- Transcriptome Analysis of Different Stages in the Early Ovarian Development of the Greater Amberjack (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Spermatogenesis advancement in pre-pubertal meagre Argyrosomus regius treated with recombinant gonadotropins.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Transcriptomic Analysis Provides New Insights into Oocyte Growth and Maturation in Greater Amberjack (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The greater amberjack Seriola dumerili is a promising candidate for aquaculture production. This study compares the ovary transcriptome of greater amberjack sampled in the wild (WILD) with hatchery-produced breeders reared in aquaculture sea cages in the Mediterranean Sea. Among the seven sampled cultured fish, three were classified as reproductively dysfunctional (DysF group), while four showed no signs of reproductive alteration (NormalF group). The DysF fish showed 1,166 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) compared to WILD females, and 755 DEGs compared to the NormalF. According to gene ontology (GO) analysis, DysF females exhibited enrichment of genes belonging to the biological categories classified as Secreted, ECM-receptor interaction, and Focal adhesion. Protein-protein interaction analysis revealed proteins involved in the biological categories of ECM-receptor interaction, Enzyme-linked receptor protein signaling, Wnt signal transduction pathways, and Ovulation cycle. KEGG pathway analysis showed DEGs involved in 111 pathways, including Neuroactive ligand-receptor interaction, Steroid hormone biosynthesis, Cell cycle, Oocyte meiosis, Necroptosis, Ferroptosis, Apoptosis, Autophagy, Progesterone-mediated oocyte maturation, Endocytosis and Phagosome, as well as Hedgehog, Apelin, PPAR, Notch, and GnRH signalling pathways. Additionally, DysF females exhibited factors encoded by upregulated genes associated with hypogonadism and polycystic ovary syndrome in mammals. This study -which is part of a broader research effort examining the transcriptome of the entire reproductive axis in greater amberjack of both sexes-, enhances our comprehension of the mechanisms underlying the appearance of reproductive dysfunctions when fish are reared under aquaculture conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.