ReviewLeukemia2024
BCR::ABL1 Proteolysis-targeting chimeras (PROTACs): The new frontier in the treatment of Ph
Review in Leukemia, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Proteolysis Targeting Chimeric-Based Technology in Myeloma and Lymphoma.Molecular cancer therapeutics · 2026Review
- Intrinsic cellular resistance to BCR::ABL1 inhibitors.Haematologica · 2026Review
- Article
- From fatal disease to functional cure: 25 years of tyrosine kinase inhibition in chronic myeloid leukemia.Leukemia · 2026Review
- Evolving Therapeutic Algorithms in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: Integrating Efficacy, Safety, and Survivorship.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Advances in Targeting BCR-ABLMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Nephroprotective Effects of Quercetin-Selenium Nanoparticles Against Glycerol-Induced AKI.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Review
- Oncogenic gene fusions in cancer: from biology to therapy.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2025Review
- Review
- Can PROTACs cure Leukemia?Leukemia · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
bcr:ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have turned chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) from a lethal condition into a chronic ailment. With optimal management, the survival of CML patients diagnosed in the chronic phase is approaching that of age-matched controls. However, only one-third of patients can discontinue TKIs and enter a state of functional cure termed treatment-free remission (TFR), while the remainder require life-long TKI therapy to avoid the recurrence of active leukemia. Approximately 10% of patients exhibit primary or acquired TKI resistance and eventually progress to the blast phase. It is thought that recurrence after attempted TFR originates from CML stem cells (LSCs) surviving despite continued suppression of BCR::ABL1 kinase. Although kinase activity is indispensable for induction of overt CML, kinase-independent scaffold functions of BCR::ABL1 are known to contribute to leukemogenesis, raising the intriguing but as yet hypothetical possibility, that degradation of BCR::ABL1 protein may accomplish what TKIs fail to achieve - eliminate residual LSCs to turn functional into real cures. The advent of BCR::ABL1 proteolysis targeting chimeras (PROTACs), heterobifunctional molecules linking a TKI-based warhead to an E3 ligase recruiter, has moved clinical protein degradation into the realm of the possible. Here we examine the molecular rationale as well as pros and cons of degrading BCR::ABL1 protein. We review reported BCR::ABL1 PROTACs, point out limitations of available data and compounds and suggest directions for future research. Ultimately, clinical testing of a potent and specific BCR::ABL1 degrader will be required to determine the efficacy and tolerability of this approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.