Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39098886›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Trust value evaluation of cloud service providers using fuzzy inference based analytical process.

Jomina John, K John Singh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jomina John *School of Computer Science Engineering and Information Systems, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, 632014, India.
K John Singh *School of Computer Science Engineering and Information Systems, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, 632014, India. johnsingh.k@vit.ac.in.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Users can purchase virtualized computer resources using the cloud computing concept, which is a novel and innovative way of computing. It offers numerous advantages for IT and healthcare industries over traditional methods. However, a lack of trust between CSUs and CSPs is hindering the widespread adoption of cloud computing across industries. Since cloud computing offers a wide range of trust models and strategies, it is essential to analyze the service using a detailed methodology in order to choose the appropriate cloud service for various user types. Finding a wide variety of comprehensive elements that are both required and sufficient for evaluating any cloud service is vital in order to achieve that. As a result, this study suggests an accurate, fuzzy logic-based trust evaluation model for evaluating the trustworthiness of a cloud service provider. Here, we examine how fuzzy logic raises the efficiency of trust evaluation. Trust is assessed using Quality of Service (QoS) characteristics like security, privacy, dynamicity, data integrity, and performance. The outcomes of a MATLAB simulation demonstrate the viability of the suggested strategy in a cloud setting.

Indexed as

Cloud computingCloud securityCloud service providerFuzzy logicTrust modelTrust parametersTrust score

Identifiers

PMID39098886
PMCPMC11298524

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.