Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39098026›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental health and preventive medicine2024

Designing a test battery for workers' well-being: the first wave of the Tsukuba Salutogenic Occupational Cohort Study.

Shotaro Doki, Daisuke Hori, Tsukasa Takahashi, Kei Muroi, Mami Ishitsuka, Asako Matsuura, Hotaka Tsukada, Wakako Migaki, Norishige Kanai, Yu Ikeda and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental health and preventive medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Shotaro DokiInstitute of Medicine, University of Tsukuba.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4026-9058
Daisuke HoriInstitute of Medicine, University of Tsukuba.
Tsukasa TakahashiInstitute of Medicine, University of Tsukuba.
Kei MuroiGraduate School of Comprehensive Human Sciences, University of Tsukuba.
Mami IshitsukaGraduate School of Comprehensive Human Sciences, University of Tsukuba.
Asako MatsuuraGraduate School of Comprehensive Human Sciences, University of Tsukuba.
Hotaka TsukadaGraduate School of Comprehensive Human Sciences, University of Tsukuba.
Wakako MigakiGraduate School of Comprehensive Human Sciences, University of Tsukuba.
Norishige KanaiGraduate School of Comprehensive Human Sciences, University of Tsukuba.
Yu IkedaGraduate School of Comprehensive Human Sciences, University of Tsukuba.
Soshi TakaoDepartment of Epidemiology, Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University.
Ichiyo MatsuzakiInstitute of Medicine, University of Tsukuba.
Shin-Ichiro SasaharaInstitute of Medicine, University of Tsukuba.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn recent years, there has been a diversification of working styles. The concept of workers' well-being is no longer limited to material wealth, such as how satisfied they are with their wages. Psychological enrichment, encompassing factors like motivation and interpersonal relationships, is also important. This study was established to develop a scale to evaluate the well-being of workers, named the Abundance Index for Workers (AIW). This new concept proposed by the authors comprehensively considers both job-related resources and personal and societal resources.

methodsThis study was carried out as part of the Tsukuba Salutogenic Occupational Cohort Study (T-SOCS). We utilized data from a survey targeting workers affiliated with institutions under the Tsukuba Science City Network, examining aspects of their daily life, work, and mental health. The deviation scores for each survey item were averaged to calculate an overall score. The correlations of the comprehensive score with the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) index for depression and the Single-item Presenteeism Question (SPQ) index for presenteeism were analyzed to determine criterion-related validity.

resultsThe number of participants analyzed was 2,745. Factor analysis categorized the data into three factors: workplace mental health, societal resources, and lifestyle habits. Cronbach's α coefficient was 0.688. There were correlations of -0.363 (p < 0.001) between the total score and SPQ, and -0.558 (p < 0.001) between the total score and PHQ-9, suggesting a degree of criterion-related validity.

conclusionsIn this study, we designed a test battery that assesses workers' well-being based on job-related resources and the richness of societal resources. The internal consistency of this battery was not as high as expected due to the broad scope of well-being. Although it is difficult to evaluate workers' well-being on a single scale, we believe that the AIW functions well as a test battery by combining scales with different attributes, which enables well-being to be captured from as many different perspectives as possible. This tool is designed to assist individuals in evaluating their own well-being and recognizing factors that can enhance it.

trial registrationNot applicable; this study is not an intervention trial.

Indexed as

Occupational HealthAdultCohort StudiesFemaleHumansJapanLife StyleMaleMental HealthMiddle AgedPresenteeismSurveys and QuestionnairesWorkplaceYoung AdultMental healthPsychometricStressTest batteryWell-beingWorker

Identifiers

PMID39098026
PMCPMC11310558

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.