ArticlePhysiological reports2024
Angiographic evaluation of coronary artery disease in diabetic patients with and without end-stage kidney disease.
Article in Physiological reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Angiographic evaluation of coronary artery disease in diabetic patients with and without end-stage kidney disease.Physiological reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The objective of the present investigation was to compare the coronary angiography results in diabetic patients with and without end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). We included prolonged diabetic patients with ESKD (93 patients) and without ESKD (control group, 126 patients). Angiography of the coronary arteries was performed on all patients. Our results revealed that the ESKD patients tended to have a higher degree of coronary artery stenosis in all parts of LAD (p = 0.001, 0.024, and 0.005), proximal and distal RCA (p = 0.013, and 0.008), and proximal and distal LCX artery (p = 0.001, 0.008) than non-ESKD patients. Furthermore, we found that the ESKD group had higher significant coronary artery stenosis in the LAD artery (60.5% vs. 39.5%, p < 0.001), RCA (60.3% vs. 39.7%, p < 0.001), LCX artery (79.5% vs. 20.5%, p < 0.001), and LMCA (84.6% vs 15.4%, p = 0.002) compared to control group. There was a greater prevalence of multiple vessels coronary artery disease (≥ two) among ESKD patients (29%), compared with the non-ESKD group (16.8%, p < 0.001). Significant coronary artery stenosis was meaningfully higher in asymptomatic diabetic ESKD patients on hemodialysis than non-ESKD diabetic patients. Coronary angiography may be beneficial in diabetic patients with ESKD regardless of whether they have ischemic symptoms with low complication rate through radial access.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.