Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39097980›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental microbiology reports2024

Wolbachia confers protection against the entomopathogenic fungus Metarhizium pingshaense in African Aedes aegypti.

Etienne Bilgo, Maria Vittoria Mancini, Jacques E Gnambani, Houeffa Adeline Tatiana Dokpomiwa, Shivan Murdochy, Brian Lovett, Raymond St Leger, Steven P Sinkins, Abdoulaye Diabate

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental microbiology reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Etienne BilgoInstitut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé, Direction Régionale de l'Ouest, Dioulasso, Burkina Faso.ORCID 0000-0003-2350-9339
Maria Vittoria ManciniMRC-University of Glasgow Centre for Virus Research, Glasgow, UK.
Jacques E GnambaniInstitut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé, Direction Régionale de l'Ouest, Dioulasso, Burkina Faso.
Houeffa Adeline Tatiana DokpomiwaInstitut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé, Direction Régionale de l'Ouest, Dioulasso, Burkina Faso.
Shivan MurdochyMRC-University of Glasgow Centre for Virus Research, Glasgow, UK.
Brian LovettUnited States Department of Agriculture Research Service, Ithaca, New York, USA.
Raymond St LegerUniversity of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA.
Steven P SinkinsMRC-University of Glasgow Centre for Virus Research, Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2678-1832
Abdoulaye DiabateInstitut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé, Direction Régionale de l'Ouest, Dioulasso, Burkina Faso.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council AV/PP0025/1Wellcome Trust 108508/Z/15/ZWellcome Trust 202888/Z/16/ZWellcome Trust 226166/Z/22/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Symbiotic and pathogenic microorganisms such as bacteria and fungi represent promising alternatives to chemical insecticides to respond to the rapid increase of insecticide resistance and vector-borne disease outbreaks. This study investigated the interaction of two strains of Wolbachia, wAlbB and wAu, with the natural entomopathogenic fungi from Burkina Faso Metarhizium pingshaense, known to be lethal against Anopheles mosquitoes. In addition to showing the potential of Metarhizium against African Aedes aegypti wild-type populations, our study shows that the wAlbB and wAu provide a protective advantage against entomopathogenic fungal infections. Compared to controls, fungal-infected wAu and wAlbB-carrying mosquitoes showed higher longevity, without any significant impact on fecundity and fertility phenotypes. This study provides new insights into the complex multipartite interaction among the mosquito host, the Wolbachia endosymbiont and the entomopathogenic fungus that might be employed to control mosquito populations. Future research should investigate the fitness costs of Wolbachia, as well as its spread and prevalence within mosquito populations. Additionally, evaluating the impact of Wolbachia on interventions involving Metarhizium pingshaense through laboratory and semi-field population studies will provide valuable insights into the effectiveness of this combined approach.

Indexed as

AedesMetarhiziumWolbachiaAnimalsBurkina FasoFemaleFertilityLongevityMosquito ControlMosquito VectorsPest Control, BiologicalSymbiosis

Identifiers

PMID39097980
PMCPMC11298244

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.