Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39097847›Full record

ArticleBrazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]2024

Poultry slaughterhouse wastewater as a source of bacterial antimicrobial resistance.

Juliana Ferreira Nunes, Thereza Cristina da Costa Patricio, Beatriz Oliveira de Farias, Hosana Dau Ferreira de Souza, Ramon Loureiro Pimenta, Maysa Beatriz Mandetta Clementino, Miliane Moreira Soares de Souza, Irene da Silva Coelho, Shana de Mattos de Oliveira Coelho

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology], 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Genomic Surveillance of ESBL-ProducingPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Juliana Ferreira NunesFederal Rural University of Rio de Janeiro, Department of Veterinary Microbiology and Immunology, Veterinary Institute, Seropédica, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Thereza Cristina da Costa PatricioFederal Rural University of Rio de Janeiro, Department of Veterinary Microbiology and Immunology, Veterinary Institute, Seropédica, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Beatriz Oliveira de FariasOswaldo Cruz Foundation (FIOCRUZ), National Institute for Health Quality Control, Reference Microorganism Laboratory, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Hosana Dau Ferreira de SouzaFederal Rural University of Rio de Janeiro, Department of Veterinary Microbiology and Immunology, Veterinary Institute, Seropédica, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Ramon Loureiro PimentaUniversity of Vassouras, FUSVE, Vassouras, RJ, Brazil.
Maysa Beatriz Mandetta ClementinoOswaldo Cruz Foundation (FIOCRUZ), National Institute for Health Quality Control, Reference Microorganism Laboratory, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Miliane Moreira Soares de SouzaFederal Rural University of Rio de Janeiro, Department of Veterinary Microbiology and Immunology, Veterinary Institute, Seropédica, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Irene da Silva CoelhoFederal Rural University of Rio de Janeiro, Department of Veterinary Microbiology and Immunology, Veterinary Institute, Seropédica, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Shana de Mattos de Oliveira CoelhoFederal Rural University of Rio de Janeiro, Department of Veterinary Microbiology and Immunology, Veterinary Institute, Seropédica, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. shana_mattos@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4165-5735

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Slaughterhouses produce huge volumes of effluents throughout the production chain that, when discharged untreated into bodies of water, can become a source of environmental contamination. This is particularly worrisome if these effluents are used for irrigation since they increase contamination levels and spread pathogens and resistance determinants to humans and animals. Therefore, in this study, we assessed antimicrobial resistance in bacteria isolated from inlet water, equalization wastewater tanks, treatment plant wastewater, and treated wastewater in slaughterhouse facilities in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Four samples were collected at each of the collection points, between June 2021 and July 2022. Following bacterial isolation and identification, the samples were analyzed for antimicrobial resistance using the disk diffusion method to test aminoglycoside, beta-lactam, and fluoroquinolone antimicrobials. A total of 229 bacteria were isolated, with 74 isolates selected from the genera Citrobacter (12), Enterobacter (14), Klebsiella (35), Serratia (5), and Pseudomonas (8). Inlet water had the lowest number of isolates and was the only point with gentamicin-resistant isolates. Raw effluent from the equalization tank showed the highest number of isolated bacteria and resistance levels, followed by treated wastewater and the treatment plant. Across all samples, a high rate of cefoxitin-resistance was observed among the isolated bacteria. Klebsiella pneumoniae stood out as the species that demonstrated the greatest resistance to a variety of antimicrobials. These results highlight the importance of water quality monitoring in mitigating public health and environmental risks and high antimicrobial resistance levels.

Indexed as

AbattoirsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteriaDrug Resistance, BacterialWastewaterAnimalsBrazilMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPoultryWater MicrobiologyAnti-Bacterial AgentsWastewaterAntimicrobial resistanceKlebsiella pneumoniaeMultidrug-resistantOne HealthWater quality

Identifiers

PMID39097847
PMCPMC11711597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.