ReviewBiomarker research2024
Cancer immunotherapy and its facilitation by nanomedicine.
Review in Biomarker research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Precision management of cervical cancer emphasizes immunotherapy combination regimens and translational advances.Discover oncology · 2026Review
- Nanoplatform-Mediated Remodeling of the Immune Microenvironment in Renal Cell Carcinoma.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Biomimetic Polymer-Based Nanomaterials for Immune-Responsive Hepatocellular Carcinoma Therapy.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Research Progress of Multicomponent Co-Loaded Nanomedicine Delivery Systems for Tumor Immunotherapy.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Mitochondria-Targeted Nanoformulations: New Therapeutic Strategies and Opportunities for Cancer Immunotherapy.Current drug targets · 2026Review
- Latest Advancements in Biotherapeutics.Current pharmaceutical biotechnology · 2026Article
- Engineered immune-driven theranostics for clinical cardiology.Military Medical Research · 2025Review
- Nanocarriers for cutting-edge cancer immunotherapies.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Review
- Nanobodies targeting the tumor microenvironment and their formulation as nanomedicines.Molecular cancer · 2025Review
- Overcoming resistant cancerous tumors through combined photodynamic and immunotherapy (photoimmunotherapy).Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Nanomedicine for cancer patient-centered care.MedComm · 2024Review
- From Bench to Bedside in Emerging Therapies for Gynecological Malignancies: A Narrative Review.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cancer immunotherapy has sparked a wave of cancer research, driven by recent successful proof-of-concept clinical trials. However, barriers are emerging during its rapid development, including broad adverse effects, a lack of reliable biomarkers, tumor relapses, and drug resistance. Integration of nanomedicine may ameliorate current cancer immunotherapy. Ultra-large surface-to-volume ratio, extremely small size, and easy modification surface of nanoparticles enable them to selectively detect cells and kill cancer cells in vivo. Exciting synergistic applications of the two approaches have emerged in treating various cancers at the intersection of cancer immunotherapy and cancer nanomedicine, indicating the potential that the combination of these two therapeutic modalities can lead to new paradigms in the treatment of cancer. This review discusses the status of current immunotherapy and explores the possible opportunities that the nanomedicine platform can make cancer immunotherapy more powerful and precise by synergizing the two approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.