Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39097698›Full record

ArticleBMC anesthesiology2024

Comment on: "Operator gender differences in major mechanical complications after central line insertions: a subgroup analysis of a prospective multicentre cohort study".

Jose A Calvache, Markus Klimek

Abstract readLetterComment
In one paragraph

Article in BMC anesthesiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jose A CalvacheDepartment of Anesthesiology, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Dr. Molewaterplein 40 , PO Box 2040, Rotterdam, MC, 3015 GD, The Netherlands. j.calvacheespana@erasmusmc.nl.
Markus KlimekDepartment of Anesthesiology, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Dr. Molewaterplein 40 , PO Box 2040, Rotterdam, MC, 3015 GD, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We read with great interest the recent study by Naddi et al. in BMC Anesthesiology, which explores operator gender differences in major mechanical complications following central venous catheterization. The study identifies male operator gender as an independent risk factor for complications. However, our attempt to replicate these findings using Colombian data did not support this association. We caution against oversimplifying the influence of sex and gender on health outcomes, as numerous factors, including cultural norms, healthcare practices, and resource availability, significantly impact procedural outcomes. Differences in complication rates may reflect risk-taking behaviors and systemic healthcare disparities rather than inherent biological differences. We emphasize the need for a comprehensive approach to understand the multifaceted nature of central venous related complications. Replication studies across diverse populations are crucial for validating these findings and informing effective strategies for complication prevention and management.

Indexed as

Catheterization, Central VenousCohort StudiesColombiaFemaleHumansMaleMulticenter Studies as TopicProspective StudiesRisk FactorsSex Factors

Identifiers

PMID39097698
PMCPMC11297566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.