Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39097655›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

An intuitionistic fuzzy graph's variation coefficient measure with application to selecting a reliable alliance partner.

Naveen Kumar Akula, Sharief Basha S, Nainaru Tarakaramu, Obbu Ramesh, Sameh Askar, Uma Maheswari Rayudu, Hijaz Ahmad, M Ijaz Khan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Naveen Kumar AkulaDepartment of Mathematics, Mother Theresa Institute of Engineering and Technology, Palamaner, A.P, 517408, India.
Sharief Basha SDepartment of Mathematics, School of Advanced Sciences, Vellore Institute of Technology, 632014, Vellore, Tamilnadu, India.
Nainaru TarakaramuDepartment of Mathematics, School of Liberal Arts and Sciences, Mohan Babu University (Erstwhile Sree Vidyanikethan Engineering College), Sree Sainath Nagar, Tirupati, A.P, 517102, India. nainaru143@gmail.com.
Obbu RameshDepartment of Mathematics, Presidency University, Bengaluru, Karnataka, 560064, India.
Sameh AskarDepartment of Statistics and Operations Research, College of Science, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2455, 11451, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Uma Maheswari RayuduDepartment of Computer Science & Engineering, Koneru Lakshmaiah Education Foundation, Vaddeswaram, Guntur District, 522302, A.P, India.
Hijaz AhmadOperational Research Center in Healthcare, Near East University, TRNC Mersin 10, Turkey.
M Ijaz KhanDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering, Prince Mohammad Bin Fahd University, Al-Khobar 31952, P. O. Box, 1664, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

Sameh Askar RSP2024R167
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Group decision-making (GDM) is crucial in various components of graph theory, management science, and operations research. In particular, in an intuitionistic fuzzy group decision-making problem, the experts communicate their preferences using intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations (IFPRs). This approach is a way that decision-makers rank or select the most desirable alternatives by gathering criteria-based information to estimate the best alternatives using a wider range of knowledge and experience. This article proposes a new statistical measure in a fuzzy environment when the data is ambiguous or unreliable to solve a decision-making problem. This study uses the variation coefficient measure combined with intuitionistic fuzzy graphs (IFG) and Laplacian energy (LE) to solve a GDM problem that utilizes intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations (IFPRs) to select a reliable alliance partner. Initially, the Laplacian energy determines the weight of individual standards, and the obtained weight average further estimates the overall criterion weight vector. We establish the authority criteria weights using the variation coefficient measure and then ultimately rank the alternatives for each criterion using the same measure. We examine four distinct companies Alpha, Beta, Delta, and Zeta to conduct a realistic GDM to choose which alliance partner would be ideal. We successfully implemented the suggested technique, determining that Alpha satisfies company standards and is ranked first among other companies. Moreover, this technique is useful for all kinds of Intuitionistic fuzzy group decision-making problems to select optimal ones.

Indexed as

Alliance partnerIntuitionistic fuzzy graphIntuitionistic fuzzy preference relationLaplacian energyVariation coefficient

Identifiers

PMID39097655
PMCPMC11297918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.