Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39097542›Full record

ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2024

Predicting Knee Joint Contact Force Peaks During Gait Using a Video Camera or Wearable Sensors.

Jere Lavikainen, Lauri Stenroth, Paavo Vartiainen, Tine Alkjær, Pasi A Karjalainen, Marius Henriksen, Rami K Korhonen, Mimmi Liukkonen, Mika E Mononen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jere LavikainenDepartment of Technical Physics, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland. jere.lavikainen@uef.fi.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7636-8229
Lauri StenrothDepartment of Technical Physics, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Paavo VartiainenDepartment of Technical Physics, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Tine AlkjærDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Pasi A KarjalainenDepartment of Technical Physics, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Marius HenriksenThe Parker Institute, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Rami K KorhonenDepartment of Technical Physics, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Mimmi LiukkonenDiagnostic Imaging Centre, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland.
Mika E MononenDepartment of Technical Physics, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.

Funding

Innovation Fund Denmark 9088-00006BResearch Committee of the Kuopio University Catchment Area 5654242Research Council of Finland 322423Research Council of Finland 324994Research Council of Finland 328920Research Council of Finland 332915Research Council of Finland 334773Research Council of Finland 349469Research Council of Finland 352666Sigrid Juséliuksen Säätiö 230093Sigrid Juséliuksen Säätiö 230123
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeEstimating loading of the knee joint may be helpful in managing degenerative joint diseases. Contemporary methods to estimate loading involve calculating knee joint contact forces using musculoskeletal modeling and simulation from motion capture (MOCAP) data, which must be collected in a specialized environment and analyzed by a trained expert. To make the estimation of knee joint loading more accessible, simple input predictors should be used for predicting knee joint loading using artificial neural networks.

methodsWe trained feedforward artificial neural networks (ANNs) to predict knee joint loading peaks from the mass, height, age, sex, walking speed, and knee flexion angle (KFA) of subjects using their existing MOCAP data. We also collected an independent MOCAP dataset while recording walking with a video camera (VC) and inertial measurement units (IMUs). We quantified the prediction accuracy of the ANNs using walking speed and KFA estimates from (1) MOCAP data, (2) VC data, and (3) IMU data separately (i.e., we quantified three sets of prediction accuracy metrics).

resultsUsing portable modalities, we achieved prediction accuracies between 0.13 and 0.37 root mean square error normalized to the mean of the musculoskeletal analysis-based reference values. The correlation between the predicted and reference loading peaks varied between 0.65 and 0.91. This was comparable to the prediction accuracies obtained when obtaining predictors from motion capture data. DISCUSSION: The prediction results show that both VCs and IMUs can be used to estimate predictors that can be used in estimating knee joint loading outside the motion laboratory. Future studies should investigate the usability of the methods in an out-of-laboratory setting.

Indexed as

GaitKnee JointNeural Networks, ComputerVideo RecordingWearable Electronic DevicesAdultBiomechanical PhenomenaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedModels, BiologicalArtificial neural networksComputer visionContact forceGait analysisInertial measurement unitsKnee jointOpenPose

Identifiers

PMID39097542
PMCPMC11561138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.