Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39097538›Full record

SynthesisArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2024

Transvaginal morcellation within an enclosed bag in gynecological surgeries: a comprehensive systematic review and analysis of safety, efficacy, and outcomes.

Omar Alomari, Muhammed Edib Mokresh, Emir Muvaffak, Rahime Nurbanu Bakir, Raghad Al Shomali, Serkan Akis, Sami Acar, Murat Api

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Omar Alomari *Hamidiye International Faculty of Medicine, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, 34668, Türkiye.
Muhammed Edib Mokresh *Hamidiye International Faculty of Medicine, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, 34668, Türkiye. m.edib.mokresh@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0239-5814
Emir MuvaffakHamidiye International Faculty of Medicine, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, 34668, Türkiye.
Rahime Nurbanu BakirHamidiye International Faculty of Medicine, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, 34668, Türkiye.
Raghad Al ShomaliHamidiye International Faculty of Medicine, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, 34668, Türkiye.
Serkan AkisFaculty of Medicine, Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Marmara University, Pendik Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Sami AcarFaculty of Medicine, Department of General Surgery, Tekirdağ Namık Kemal University, 59100, Terkirdağ, Türkiye.
Murat ApiDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Kartal Dr. Lutfi Kirdar Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis systematic review aims to comprehensively assess the safety and efficacy of transvaginal morcellation within an enclosed bag in gynecological surgeries, with a focus on its benefits, potential risks, and recommendations for its use.

methodsWe conducted a comprehensive search of Epistemonikos, Web of Science, Medline (PubMed), Scopus, and Cochrane databases for studies on transvaginal contained morcellation in adult patients undergoing gynecological surgeries. The review included 22 studies that met the inclusion criteria, encompassing diverse surgical procedures, patient profiles, and outcomes. These studies were thoroughly reviewed and analyzed to assess the safety and efficacy of the morcellation technique.

resultsKey findings from the selected studies indicate that transvaginal morcellation within an enclosed bag offers several advantages in gynecological surgeries, including reduced invasiveness, shorter operative times, and minimal blood loss when compared to conventional methods. The risk of tumor recurrence or dissemination appears to be low when appropriate precautions are taken, emphasizing the technique's safety, especially when performed by experienced surgical teams. While some studies reported complications, these were generally not directly associated with the morcellation technique.

conclusionTransvaginal morcellation within an enclosed bag demonstrates potential as a safe and effective option for gynecological surgeries. The technique offers the benefits of minimally invasive procedures, including reduced bleeding, shorter recovery times, and improved cosmetic outcomes. This review also highlights the need for standardization in study methodologies and reporting, as the heterogeneity in outcomes across the selected studies poses challenges in drawing definitive conclusions.

Indexed as

Gynecologic Surgical ProceduresMorcellationBlood Loss, SurgicalFemaleHumansOperative TimeTreatment OutcomeVaginaGynecological surgeryIn-bagSafetySurgical complicationsTransvaginal

Identifiers

PMID39097538
PMCPMC11393211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.